【摘要】 教育数字化正推动终身教育由功能整合走向制度重构，面临“技术活跃—制度惰性”的结构张力。基于社会—技术系统转型理论与多层次分析模型，对数字化进程较为成熟国家和地区的终身教育实践图谱进行比较分析，系统梳理数字化嵌入终身教育体系的关键要素与作用机制。分析显示，终身教育的结构性演进依赖于宏观合法性压力的“制度化”、中观制度接口的“互操作化”与微观技术应用的“证据化”三层联动。针对我国终身教育体系在宏观战略转化乏力、中观层面学习成果互认难、微观技术应用碎片化的痛点，提出分层推进的制度化路径：宏观上通过立法确立教育主权与数字学习权，中观上构建国家学习凭证链与数字资历框架以打通学习成果互认堵点，微观上建立基于证据闭环的学习分析国家平台，从而推动终身教育体系实现从“信息化管理”向“智能化治理”的制度生态转型。更多还原

【Abstract】 Education digitalization is driving lifelong education to move beyond functional integration toward institutional reconstruction, while also generating a structural tension between “technological dynamism” and “institutional inertia.” Drawing on socio-technical transitions theory and the multi-level perspective, this study conducts a comparative analysis of lifelong education practice maps in countries and regions with relatively mature digitalization. It systematically identifies the key elements and mechanisms through which digitalization is embedded in lifelong education systems. The analysis indicates that the structural evolution of lifelong education depends on the coordinated interaction of three levels: the institutionalization of macro-level legitimacy pressures,the interoperability of meso-level institutional interfaces, and the evidence-based grounding of micro-level technological applications.However, China’s lifelong education system faces bottlenecks at all three levels, including limited capacity to translate macro-level strategies into effective action, difficulties in the mutual recognition of learning outcomes at the meso-level, and fragmented technological applications at the micro-level.To address these challenges, this study proposes a tiered pathway: at the macro-level, it calls for legislation to establish educational sovereignty and the right to digital learning; at the meso-level, it recommends building a national learning credential chain and a digital qualifications framework to remove bottlenecks in mutual recognition of learning outcomes; at the micro-level, it proposes developing a national learning analytics platform grounded in an evidence-based closed feedback loop.Together, they aim to enable the lifelong education system to transform from “information-based management” to “intelligent governance,” fostering a renewed institutional ecology.更多还原