节点文献

《企业职业卫生负责人法律认受性测量问卷》编制与信效度分析

Establishment and verification of Questionnaire on the Legal Legitimacy of Enterprise Occupational Health Managers

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陆霖芸刘汝青胡世杰胡汝为

【Author】 LU Linyun;LIU Ruqing;HU Shijie;HU Ruwei;School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University;

【通讯作者】 胡世杰;胡汝为;

【机构】 中山大学公共卫生学院广东省职业病防治院

【摘要】 目的 编制面向企业职业卫生负责人的法律认受性测量问卷,并进行信效度检验。方法 基于主观程序正义理论,通过文献回顾与政策筛选、数据库资料整理和专家访谈构建《企业职业卫生负责人法律认受性测量问卷》条目池。采用德尔菲法对37位专家展开两轮专家函询工作,依据专家意见对问卷条目池进行调整和完善,确定最终的问卷。采用随机数表法选择317名职业卫生负责人进行问卷调查,检验问卷信效度。结果 两轮专家咨询的问卷回收率分别为94.6%和100.0%,专家权威系数为0.82,Kendall′s W协调系数分别为0.16和0.23(P值均<0.001)。最终确定的《企业职业卫生负责人法律认受性测量问卷》包含法律表述、执法、社会环境和服从法律的义务4个维度,21个条目。问卷及其4个维度的Cronbach′s α系数分别为0.96、0.97、0.98、0.70和0.91(均>0.70),每个条目修正后的项与总计相关性均>0.50;验证性因子分析结果显示各指标均达到良好拟合标准,χ~2/自由度比值=2.85,拟合优度指数=0.917,调整的拟合优度指数=0.905,比较拟合指数=0.933,Tucker-Lewis指数=0.909,近似误差均方根=0.056,标准化均方根残差=0.059。4个维度的组合信度分别为0.97、0.98、0.63和0.89;平均方差抽取量分别为0.73、0.91、0.45和0.73。结论 所编制《企业职业卫生负责人法律认受性测量问卷》信效度良好,具有较高的科学性与可靠性,可用作企业职业卫生负责人对职业病防治相关法律法规认受性的测量工具。

【Abstract】 Objective To develop a questionnaire for measuring the legal legitimacy of occupational health managers among enterprises, and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the theory of subjective procedural justice, an item pool for the Questionnaire on the Legal Legitimacy of Enterprise Occupational Health Managers was constructed through literature review and policy screening, database collation, and expert interviews. The Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert consultation with 37 experts, and the questionnaire item pool was adjusted and refined based on the experts′ opinions to determine the final version of the questionnaire. A total of 317 occupational health managers were selected using a random number table method to complete the questionnaire survey. The data were then used to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results The questionnaire response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were 94.6% and 100.0%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient was 0.82, and Kendall′s W coefficients of concordance were 0.16 and 0.23, respectively(both P<0.001). The final version of Questionnaire on the Legal Legitimacy of Enterprise Occupational Health Managers consists of four dimensions(legal statement, law enforcement, social environment, and obligation to comply with the law) with a total of 21 items. The Cronbach′s α coefficients for the overall questionnaire and its four dimensions were 0.96, 0.97, 0.98, 0.70, and 0.91, respectively(all >0.70). The corrected item-total correlation for each item was >0.50. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that all fit indices met good fit standards: χ ~2/df ratio = 2.85, goodness-of-fit index = 0.917, adjusted goodness-of-fit index = 0.905, comparative fit index = 0.933, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.909, root mean square error of approximation = 0.056, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.059. The composite reliabilities for the four dimensions were 0.97, 0.98, 0.63, and 0.89, respectively. The average variance extracted values were 0.73, 0.91, 0.45, and 0.73, respectively. Conclusion The newly developed Questionnaire on the Legal Legitimacy of Enterprise Occupational Health Managers demonstrates good reliability and validity, with strong scientific rigor and robustness. It can be used as a measurement tool for assessing the legal legitimacy of occupational disease prevention and control laws and regulations among enterprise occupational health managers.

  • 【文献出处】 中国职业医学 ,China Occupational Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2026年01期
  • 【分类号】R132
  • 【下载频次】16
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络