【摘要】 选择合适的回收模式是实现退役动力电池高效回收的关键,本研究构建了动力电池制造商主导的,与整车制造商及第三方回收商组成的电动汽车动力电池闭环供应链,探究碳限额交易机制下单渠道垄断回收、混合回收和联盟回收模式下的供应链成员最优决策,并对比不同回收模式下的供应链利润和回收率,通过数值分析进一步分析了回收渠道竞争、消费者环境意识、碳配额和碳价对供应链利润和回收率的影响.研究结果表明,动力电池回收供应链最优决策受碳限额交易机制和回收模式的影响,渠道联盟回收模式下的供应链利润和回收率优于单渠道垄断回收和混合回收;碳限额交易机制改善了供应链利润,表现在碳配额和碳价的上升均有利于供应链利润的增加,而碳价的上升导致回收率表现不佳;渠道间竞争程度的加剧不利于供应链利润和回收率的增长,而消费者环境意识的提高将推动供应链利润和回收率的增长.本研究为碳限额交易机制下动力电池回收模式的选择及减排决策提供理论支持.更多还原

【Abstract】 Choosing the appropriate recycling model is the key to achieving standardized recycling of retired power batteries. This paper constructs a closed-loop supply chain led by a power battery manufacturer and composed of a vehicle manufacturer and third-party recycler, to explore the optimal decisions of supply chain members under the carbon cap-andtrade mechanism, and to compare the supply chain profits and recycling rates of single-channel recycling, mixed recycling,and alliance recycling models. The impacts of channel competition intensity, carbon quota, and carbon price on supply chain performance are further analyzed. Results show that the supply chain decisions are affected by the carbon cap-andtrade mechanism and recycling models. Moreover, the supply chain profits and recycling rates of the alliance recycling model are better than those of the other models. The carbon cap-and-trade mechanism improves the supply chain profits.Specifically, an increase of carbon quota and carbon price is conducive to the increase of the supply chain profit, while the increase of carbon price leads to poor recycling rate. The intensified competition among channels is not conducive to the growth of supply chain profits and recycling rates, while the increase in consumer environmental awareness will promote them. This study provides theoretical support for selecting and improving power battery recycling models under the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism.更多还原