【摘要】 在国内人文学术界，目前有两种看似相互抵牾的诉求与现象：一是强调让中华文化产品走向世界，提高其国际影响力，增强中国文化软实力；二是强调构建中国自主的学科体系、话语体系与知识体系。具体到中国传统文化研究领域，有些学者主张用“以中释中”的新模式取代以往“以西释中”的旧模式；在中国哲学领域，有些学者提出，应聚焦汉语的特殊性，以及熔铸于汉语经典文献的中国经验与智慧的特殊性，建立“汉语哲学”。研究探讨如何协调这两种看似矛盾的诉求，并围绕以下问题展开论述：“以中释中”和“汉语哲学”的具体内涵是什么，为何有必要提出这些概念和主张，以及在实践中如何推进相关研究。这里所赞同的立场是：中国哲学从中西互释中挺立。更多还原

【Abstract】 Currently, there coexist in Chinese humanism academia two seemingly conflicting cultural demands and phenomena: one is to promote Chinese culture globally, to enhance the international influence of Chinese cultural products, and to strengthen China’ s cultural soft power; the other is to construct an autonomous conceptual system, discourse system, and knowledge system with Chinese characteristics. In the research on traditional Chinese culture, some scholars advocate replacing the existing model of “interpreting Chinese thoughts from a Western perspective” [ 以西释中 ] with a new approach of “interpreting Chinese thoughts from a traditional Chinese perspective” [ 以中释中 ]. Specifically, in the field of traditional Chinese philosophy, they propose focusing on the particularity of Chinese language and the distinctiveness of Chinese experiences and wisdom embodied in classical Chinese texts,and establishing the so-called “Hanyu Philosophy” [ 汉语哲学 ]. This paper focuses on the following key issues: how to reconcile these two seemingly conflicting demands; what exactly “ interpreting Chinese thoughts from a traditional Chinese perspective” and “Hanyu Philosophy” entail; why they are necessary;whether they are feasible; and how to practically implement them. It argues for the thesis that Chinese Philosophy stands firm through the mutual interpretation between East and West.更多还原