节点文献

警用无人机侦查的实践困境与规制路径

The Practical Dilemma and Regulatory Path of Police Drones Investigation

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 周长军王浩

【Author】 ZHOU Changjun;WANG Hao;Law School,Shandong University,Prosecution Theory Research Center,Shandong University;

【机构】 山东大学法学院

【摘要】 警用无人机是数字时代侦查破案、打击犯罪的新兴有效工具,已被广泛应用于犯罪现场侦勘、搜索抓捕、固定证据、挂载武器反制等侦查工作,在实践中发挥着重要的甚至是难以替代的作用。作为新生事物,警用无人机侦查面临着法律供给缺位、隐私权和个人信息权益干预风险、取证合法性不足以及适格驾驶员紧缺等问题。警用无人机侦查在性质上是技术侦查措施,其获取的证据应当归属于电子数据。在刑事诉讼法第四次修改之际,应当对警用无人机侦查作出相应的规范,建构警用无人机侦查的层级化审批模式,强化警用无人机侦查监控过程中的权利保障,健全警用无人机侦查取证规则和非法证据排除规则,加强警用无人机专业驾驶人才培养。

【Abstract】 Police drones are an emerging and effective tool for investigating and solving cases,as well as combating crime in the digital age. It has been widely used in crime scene investigation,search and arrest,collecting evidence,and mounting weapons for countermeasures. In practice,it plays an important and irreplaceable role. As a new phenomenon,police drones investigation faces problems such as lack of legal supply,risks of interference in personal information and privacy rights,insufficient legitimacy of evidence collection,and shortage of qualified pilots. Police drones investigation should be defined as a technical investigation measure in nature,and the evidence collected belongs to electronic data. In the fourth amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law,corresponding norms should be established for police drones investigation,a diversified approval model for police drones investigation should be constructed,privacy protection in the monitoring process of police drones investigation should be strengthened,rules for evidence collection and exclusion of illegal evidence collection should be improved,and professional training for police drones drivers should be strengthened.

【基金】 山东大学人文社科创新团队项目“全面依法治国战略实施中的数据运用与数据治理”;山东大学法学院研究生科创项目“数字赋能下警用无人机侦查的法律规制研究”的阶段性成果
  • 【分类号】D631.2;V19
  • 【下载频次】374
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络