节点文献

儒学复兴运动视域下白居易史学思想研究

Research on Bai Juyi’s Historiography Thought from the Perspective of the Revival Movement of Confucianism

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 方文韦统顺

【Author】 FANG Wen;WEI Tongshun;School of History,Anhui University;

【机构】 安徽大学历史学院

【摘要】 中唐所兴起的儒学复兴运动影响着哲学、文学及史学发展。作为该运动的参与者和被影响者,白居易的史学思想中有着深刻的儒学烙印。他以儒家道德伦理评价历史人物,注重史册“彰善显恶”的道德功能;其历史教育思想以儒道为中心,排斥百家之说并批评当时的儒学教育。受个人仕宦经历及儒学理论局限性的影响,白居易从早年排佛转为调和儒、释矛盾。在中唐“新《春秋》学”影响下,白居易逐渐形成历史变易观,在现实政治上主张“改制”,但他在主张变易的同时又带有一定的历史循环色彩,因而其“改制”可以说是以儒家伦理为基本原则。

【Abstract】 The Confucian revival movement in the Middle Tang Dynasty had an impact on the development of philosophy, literature and historiography. As both a participant in and a subject influenced by this movement, Bai Juyi’s historiographical thought bore deep Confucian imprints. He evaluated historical figures through the lens of Confucian morality and ethics, emphasizing the moral function of historical records to “praise the good and expose the evil.” His approach to historical education was centered on the Confucian Way, rejecting the Hundred Schools of Thought while also criticizing the Confucian education of his time. Influenced by his official career and the inherent limitations of Confucian theory, Bai shifted from his early rejection of Buddhism to a reconciliation between Confucianism and Buddhism. Under the influence of the “New Spring and Autumn Studies” of the Mid-Tang, Bai gradually developed a view of historical change, advocating institutional reform in practical politics. However, his advocacy of change was accompanied by a certain cyclical view of history, making his idea of “institutional reform” ultimately grounded in Confucian ethics as its fundamental principle.

【基金】 安徽省哲学社会科学规划重大项目(AHSKZD2023D01)
  • 【文献出处】 河南科技大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2026年02期
  • 【分类号】K092
  • 【下载频次】65
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络