【摘要】 衍生数据是数据处理者在原始数据的基础上，通过深度分析、过滤与提炼整合等处理活动生成的高附加值数据形态，具有显著的经济价值与社会价值。衍生数据构成与原始数据相互独立的新数据，其识别标准是衍生数据产权配置规则得以展开的前置性问题。衍生数据应同时满足实质改变、价值显著增值与不可逆转三重标准。实质改变标准是指衍生数据与原始数据在数据结构、内容或形式等维度存在实质差异；价值增值标准意味着衍生数据的使用价值和交换价值相较原始数据显著提升；不可逆转标准则要求衍生数据无法在经济成本或技术难度的合理范围内通过逆向工程还原为原始数据。衍生数据的产权配置规则可以类推适用民法典第322条，遵循意思自治原则确定权属，在当事人没有约定或约定不明确时，则可基于贡献赋权原则与“数尽其用”原则，由数据处理者享有持有权、使用权和经营权等数据权利。在数据处理者未取得原始数据使用权而实施加工行为的情形，在先权利人有权依个人信息权益请求权、不当得利返还请求权或侵权损害赔偿请求权获得救济。更多还原

【Abstract】 Derived data, a high-value-added form of data generated by data processors through in-depth analysis, filtering, refinement, integration, and other processing activities based on raw data, boasts notable economic and social value. The identification criteria for derived data, which is a new category of data independent from raw data, constitute a prerequisite for the formulation of rules governing the allocation of property rights over such data. Derived data should satisfy three identification criteria at the same time, i.e., substantial transformation, significant value increment, and irreversibility. The substantial transformation criterion means that there are essential differences between derived data and raw data in terms of data structure, content, or form. The value increment criterion indicates that both the use value and exchange value of derived data are significantly higher than those of raw data. The irreversibility criterion requires that derived data cannot be restored to the original raw data through reverse engineering within a reasonable scope of economic cost or technical difficulty. Article 322 of the Civil Code may be applied by analogy to the allocation of property rights over derived data. The ownership should be determined in accordance with the principle of autonomy of will. In the absence of an agreement between the parties or where the agreement is ambiguous, the data processor should be entitled to such data rights as the right to possess, use, and operate the derived data, in line with the principles of empowerment based on contribution and maximizing data utility. Where a data processor conducts processing activities without obtaining the right to use the raw data, the prior right holder should be entitled to claim remedies in accordance with law by exercising the claim to the protection of personal information legal interests, the claim of unjust enrichment, or the claim to compensation for tort damages.更多还原