【摘要】 【目的】旨在精准识别我国一流英文科技期刊与国际顶尖期刊的核心差距，为突破发展困境、实现高质量跃升提供系统性的对策参考。【方法】以“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”一期资助的22种领军期刊和29种重点期刊为样本，将面向办刊主体的结构化问卷调查与基于Web of Science的文献计量分析（2019—2023年）深度融合，构建“主观感知-客观验证-深层归因”的研究范式。【结果】研究表明，我国一流期刊与国际顶刊的差距并非单一维度的落后，而是系统性、结构性的“四重差距”：出版能力差距，深陷国际平台依赖，导致规模化发展与自主权缺失的结构性矛盾；稿源质量差距，本土集聚特征显著，全球优质稿源吸引力不足，陷入“评价体系锁定”的恶性循环；运营效能差距，前沿技术应用滞后与复合型人才短缺相互掣肘，编审团队国际化效能未充分发挥；传播影响力差距，区域辐射与全球引领的“品牌鸿沟”。【结论】破解四重差距需实施“分类施策、协同推进”的系统性工程，从自主平台赋能、评价体系优化、技术人才协同、品牌精准传播4个维度协同发力，推动我国一流英文科技期刊从“优秀”走向“卓越”。更多还原

【Abstract】 [Purposes] This study aims to accurately identify the core gaps between China’s world-class English-language scientific journals and top international journals, and to provide systematic countermeasures for breaking through development dilemmas and achieving high-quality advancement. [Methods] Taking 22 leading journals and 29 key journals funded by the first phase of the “Excellent Action Plan for China’s STM Journals” as samples, this study integrates a structured questionnaire survey targeting the core personnel of journals with bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science(from 2019 to 2023), constructing a research paradigm of “subjective perception-objective verification-in-depth attribution”. [Findings] The study finds that the gaps between China’s world-class journals and top international journals are not unidimensional but represent systematic and structural “fourfold gaps”: publication capacity gap: deep reliance on international platforms leads to structural contradictions between large-scale development and lack of autonomy; Manuscript quality gap: significant localization of manuscripts and insufficient appeal for highquality global manuscripts, falling into a vicious cycle of “evaluation system lock-in”; Operational efficiency gap: lagging application of cutting-edge technologies coupled with shortages of interdisciplinary talent, with the international efficacy of editorial and review teams not being fully realized; Communication impact gap: regional reach versus global leadership, creating a “brand divide”. [Conclusions] Breaking through the fourfold gaps requires implementing a systematic project of “categorized strategies and coordinated advancement”, making concerted efforts across four dimensions: independent platform empowerment, evaluation system optimization, technology and talent synergy, and brand precision communication, to drive China’s world-class Englishlanguage sci-tech journals from “excellence” to “superior”.更多还原