节点文献

论澳大利亚“竞争政策审查”对我国公平竞争审查的启示

On the Enlightenment of Australia’s “Competition Policy Review” to China’s Fair Competition Review

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张影丁国峰

【Author】 ZHANG Ying;DING Guofeng;School of Law,Anhui University;

【通讯作者】 丁国峰;

【机构】 安徽大学法学院

【摘要】 公平竞争审查是各国深化市场经济发展、夯实竞争政策基础地位的基本制度。比较法上澳大利亚的“竞争政策审查”制度是公平竞争审查域外经验的典范。我国也建立了公平竞争审查制度,由于发展历史较短,仍然存在审查范围尚不全面、审查模式实效性欠佳、审查流程有待细化、激励机制效果不足等协调性问题。我国可以在明确所要解决问题的基础上辩证地借鉴域外经验,总体思路上通过扩大审查范围、强化审查信息公开、确立联合审查程序、完善竞争考核激励机制,系统破解我国公平竞争审查的现实困局。

【Abstract】 Fair competition review is a fundamental system for countries to deepen the development of a market economy and consolidate the foundational role of competition policy. In comparative law,Australia’s “Competition Policy Review” system serves as a model for extraterritorial experience in fair competition review. China has also established a fair competition review system;however,due to its relatively short development history,there exist coordination problems,including an incomplete review scope,unsatisfactory effectiveness of review models,insufficient refinement of review procedures,and inadequate effect of incentive mechanisms. China can dialectically learn from extraterritorial experience based on figuring out the problems to be addressed. The overall approach is to resolve the practical challenges of China’s fair competition review systematically by expanding review scope,enhancing the disclosure of review information,establishing joint review procedures,and improving incentive mechanisms of competition assessment.

【基金】 安徽大学法学院2023年研究生优质生源创新项目“澳大利亚公平竞争审查制度的基本阐释、规则实践以及对我国启示”(M08014800)
  • 【文献出处】 淮阴工学院学报 ,Journal of Huaiyin Institute of Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2026年02期
  • 【分类号】D922.294;D961.1
  • 【下载频次】54
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络