节点文献

CBCT引导下动脉栓塞联合经尿道电切术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的临床研究

Cone-beam CT-guided prostatic artery embolization combined with transurethral resection for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: a clinical study

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 印于陈丹萍王皆杨俊李智朱晓黎倪才方

【Author】 YIN Yu;CHEN Danping;WANG Jie;YANG Jun;LI Zhi;ZHU Xiaoli;NI Caifang;Department of Interventional Radiology,First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University;

【通讯作者】 倪才方;

【机构】 苏州大学附属第一医院介入科浙江省台州医院放射科常熟市第一人民医院介入科

【摘要】 目的 探讨锥形束CT(cone-beam computer tomography, CBCT)引导下前列腺动脉栓塞术(prostatic artery embolization, PAE)联合经尿道前列腺电切术(transurethral resection of the prostate, TURP)治疗大体积(>80 mL)良性前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH)的有效性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析苏州大学附属第一医院2017年1月至2023年6月收治的433例大体积BPH患者,经1∶2倾向性匹配分析后纳入99例,其中联合组33例(行CBCT引导下PAE联合TURP),对照组66例(行单纯TURP)。比较两组患者围手术期指标、住院费用、术后并发症发生率,以及术后3、6、12个月国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)和残余尿量(PVR)。结果 围手术期指标比较显示,与对照组相比,联合组TURP手术时间(P<0.001)、膀胱冲洗时间(P<0.001)、导尿管留置时间(P<0.001)及术后住院时间(P=0.001)缩短、血红蛋白下降(P=0.027);两组前列腺切除量、住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3个月,与对照组相比,联合组IPSS评分(P=0.025)和QOL评分(P=0.011)改善,Qmax与PVR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月,联合组IPSS(P<0.001)、QOL(P=0.005)、Qmax(P=0.001)及PVR(P=0.028)优于对照组;术后12个月,联合组IPSS(P<0.001)、QOL(P<0.001)、Qmax(P<0.001)及PVR(P=0.019)仍优于对照组。联合组并发症发生率低于对照组(P=0.049)。结论 CBCT引导下PAE联合TURP治疗大体积BPH安全有效,远期疗效需进一步验证。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cone-beam CT(CBCT)-guided prostatic artery embolization(PAE) combined with transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) with prostate volume >80 mL.Methods The clinical data of 433 consecutive patients with large-volume BPH,who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University of China from January 2017 to June 2023,were retrospectively analyzed.After a 1∶2 propensity matching analysis, 99 patients were included in this study, including 33 patients in the combination group(undergoing CBCT-guided PAE combined with TURP) and 66 patients in the control group(undergoing only TURP).Perioperative parameters, hospitalization costs, incidence of postoperative complications, and 3-,6-,and 12-month International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),Quality of Life(QOL) score, maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax),and post-void residual volume(PVR) were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the control group, the combination group had much shorter TURP surgery time(P<0.001),bladder flushing time(P<0.001),catheter retention time(P<0.001),and postoperative hospitalization time(P=0.001),and decreased hemoglobin level(P=0.027).There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of prostate resection volume and hospitalization costs between the two groups(P>0.05).Three months after treatment, the combination group showed improvement in IPSS score(P=0.025) and QOL score(P=0.011) when compared with the control group, while there were no statistically significant differences in Qmax and PVR between the two groups(P>0.05).Six months after treatment, the IPSS(P<0.001),QOL(P=0.005),Qmax(P=0.001),and PVR(P=0.028) in the combination group were better than those in the control group.At 12 months after treatment, the IPSS(P<0.001),QOL(P<0.001),Qmax(P<0.001),and PVR(P=0.019) in the combination group were still better than those in the control group.The incidence of complications in the combination group was lower than that in the control group(P=0.049).Conclusion For the treatment of large-volume BPH,CBCT-guided PAE combined with TURP is clinically safe and effective, although its long-term efficacy needs further verification.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金(82272094)
  • 【文献出处】 介入放射学杂志 ,Journal of Interventional Radiology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2026年02期
  • 【分类号】R699.8
  • 【下载频次】59
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络