节点文献

融合视域下美、英、日三国0—3岁特殊婴幼儿托育服务法律与政策的国际比较和本土启示

International Comparison and Local Implications of Inclusive Childcare Policies:Policy Analysis Based on United States,United Kingdom and Japan

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 苏雪云杨云杨晓

【Author】 SU Xueyun;YANG Yun;YANG Xiao;Faculty of Education, East China Normal University;Chinese Institute for Infant and Toddler Education, East China Normal University;

【通讯作者】 杨云;

【机构】 华东师范大学教育学部华东师范大学中国婴幼儿教养研究院

【摘要】 在托幼一体化背景下,高质量的特殊婴幼儿托育服务受到越来越多的关注,但当前融合视域下我国的托育服务政策仍然存在顶层立法制度缺失、服务对象界定不清、责任主体边界不明、部门协同联动机制不畅等问题。研究对在托育服务政策较早发展的美国、英国与日本三国的相关政策进行系统分析比较,从立法保障与实践响应、服务体系与支持团队建设、跨部门协作与家庭参与等方面梳理三个国家的共同之处与不同特征。相关经验对我国的启示在于:通过推动托育公共价值重塑、分阶段推进托育服务立法、建立服务对象分类标准、加强跨部门联动协作与托幼一体化衔接以及建设专业化、多学科协作的托育师资队伍,促进我国0—3岁特殊婴幼儿托育服务政策从“理念倡导”迈向“制度构建”,在托育阶段实现真正意义上的普惠与融合。

【Abstract】 Against the backdrop of integrated early childhood care and education,high-quality childcare services for infants and toddlers with special needs are receiving increasing attention. However,under the current framework of inclusive education,China’s childcare service policies still face challenges such as the absence of overarching legislative frameworks,unclear definitions of service recipients,ambiguous delineation of responsibilities,and ineffective mechanisms for interdepartmental coordination. Drawing on international experiences,this paper conducts a systematic comparative analysis of relevant policies in the United States,the United Kingdom,and Japan with relatively advanced early childhood care and education policies. It examines commonalities and distinct characteristics across these nations in terms of legislative safeguards and practical implementation,service systems and support team development,as well as interdepartmental collaboration and family participation. Based on these findings and China’s national context,it is suggested in the paper as follows:By promoting the reshaping of the public value of early childhood care,advancing legislation for such services in phases,establishing classification standards for service recipients,strengthening interdepartmental coordination and the integration of early childhood care and education,and building a professional,multidisciplinary early childhood care workforce,China can advance its early childhood care policies for infants and toddlers aged0-3 from “conceptual advocacy” to “institutional development”,thereby achieving genuine universality and inclusion in the early childhood care sector.

  • 【文献出处】 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2026年02期
  • 【分类号】D913.9;D912.1
  • 【下载频次】84
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络