【摘要】 空间主体论把个体行动作为逻辑起点，强调了行动、规则、空间之间深层的逻辑关系。从空间主体论视角可以展开对人文经济发展的理论与实践的深度思考：其一，“行动人”假设把个体行动和行动协调纳入经济学理论体系，将经济学导向了差异空间观，而“理性人”假设则把个体行动和行动协调从经济学理论体系中排斥出去，主流经济学只有同质的空间观，而没有差异的空间观。差异空间与人文经济发展是联系在一起的。其二，“行动人”是思考人文经济学理论内涵的逻辑起点。个体行动及其协调生成了“空间性”和“地方性”,两者一旦生成，便会对个体观念和行动产生深刻影响。不同“地方性”之间的融合与交流形成了具有不同“地方性”的“节点-网络”式的空间体系，区域开放才能推动“地方性”不断演变，而封闭的“地方性”是没有生命力的，并将制约着地方社会经济的发展。其三，在空间主体论视角下，人文经济实践要做到对一般性规则的尊重，对规则的尊重就是对人的尊重；要在进一步改革开放中重塑“地方性”,探寻地方发展的内生动力；要高度重视人文创新、制度创新、科技创新这三大创新的逻辑关系，通过人文创新推动制度创新、通过制度创新推动科技创新；要以硬实力、软实力和暖实力“三个力”推动新一轮全球化，即除了有制造业为主的“硬实力”,还要有发展人文经济的“软实力”并尊重其他国家和地区文化的“暖实力”。更多还原

【Abstract】 Spatial subjectivism takes individual action as its logical starting point and emphasizes the underlying logical relationships among action, rules, and space. From the perspective of spatial subjectivism, this paper conducts in-depth reflections on the theory and practice of humanistic economics. First, the “rational man” hypothesis excludes individual action and action coordination from the theoretical framework of economics, resulting in a homogeneous view of space. In contrast, the “action man” hypothesis incorporates individual action and action coordination into the economic theory, steering economics toward a differential spatial view. Differential space is inherently linked to the development of humanistic economics. Second, the “action man” hypothesis serves as the logical starting point for contemplating the theoretical connotations of humanistic economics. Individual action and its coordination generate “spatiality” and “locality”. Once formed, these concepts profoundly influence individual perceptions and actions. The integration and exchange of different forms of “locality” create a spatial system characterized by “node-network” structures with distinct forms of “locality”. Regional openness drives the continuous evolution of “locality”, while a closed “locality” lacks vitality and constrains local socio-economic development. Finally, from the perspective of spatial subjectivism, the practice of humanistic economics must respect general rules, as respecting rules equates to respecting people. It is necessary to reshape “locality” through further reform and opening-up, exploring endogenous drivers for local development. Significant attention should be given to the logical relationships among the three types of innovation: humanistic innovation, institutional innovation, and technological innovation. Humanistic innovation should drive institutional innovation, while the latter should propel technological innovation. A new round of globalization should be advanced through “hard power”“soft power”, and “warm power”. This means that in addition to “hard power” centered on manufacturing, there must also be “soft power” in developing humanistic economics and “warm power” in respecting the cultures of other countries and regions.更多还原