【摘要】 在中国基层治理实践中，政府创新常陷入悬浮困境，表现为因执行偏差或成效不足而停滞不前，既难以深化也无法终止。既有研究多聚焦创新的启动与扩散机制，对创新陷入停滞后的“再出发”过程缺乏深入探讨。本文基于议程重置视角，构建了一个以“权威倡议”和“利益释放”为核心维度的类型学分析框架，识别出创新悬浮的三种重置模式：名存实转（弱权威倡议与强利益释放下的名义维系与实质调适）、嵌入助推（强权威倡议与弱利益释放下的局部嵌入与政策引导）和系统重构（权威倡议与利益释放双重强化下的制度重构）。对比B市开展的多项基层治理创新改革，研究发现：三种模式随倡议强度与利益结构的动态变化而演进，分别遵循容错适应、机制调适、体制重构的行动逻辑。进一步分析揭示，从“悬浮”实现“突破”存在三条关键路径：一是由名存实转至系统重构的自下而上式路径，二是由嵌入助推至系统重构的自上而下式路径，三是直接实现系统重构的双向耦合式路径。地方政府创新突破悬浮困境，实现议程重启，本质上是政治势能与改革激励在特定制度环境中复杂互动的结果。研究从“失败-重启”视角切入，为理解中国治理创新的复杂逻辑提供了新的分析概念与解释框架。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the practice of urban governance in China,local government innovation often falls into a “suspension dilemma,” characterized by stagnation due to implementation deviations or insufficient effectiveness,making it difficult to either deepen or terminate the innovation. Existing research predominantly focuses on the initiation and diffusion mechanisms of innovation,lacking indepth exploration of the “re-start” process after innovation has stalled.From the perspective of agenda resetting,this paper constructs a typological analytical framework with “authoritative advocacy” and “interest release” as its core dimensions.It identifies three resetting models for innovation suspension:Nominal Retention with Substantive Adjustment(nominal maintenance and substantive adjustment under weak authoritative advocacy and strong interest release),Embedded Boosting(authoritative embedding and policy guidance under strong authoritative leadership and weak interest release),and Systemic Restructuring(institutional reconstruction under the dual reinforcement of authoritative advocacy and interest release).By comparing several grassroots governance innovation reforms in City B,the study finds that these three models evolve with the dynamic changes in advocacy intensity and interest structure,following the action logics of political blame avoidance,mechanism optimization,and institutional restructuring,respectively.Further analysis reveals three key pathways from “suspension” to “breakthrough”:first,a bottom-up pathway from nominal retention to systemic restructuring;second,a top-down pathway from embedded boosting to systemic restructuring;and third,a two-way coupling pathway that directly achieves systemic restructuring.The breakthrough of the suspension dilemma and the realization of agenda resetting in local government innovation are essentially the result of a complex interaction between political momentum and reform incentives within a specific institutional environment.By adopting a “failure-restart” perspective,this study provides new analytical concepts and an explanatory framework for understanding the complex logic of governance innovation in China.更多还原