【摘要】 在“媒介风险论”的公共语境下，限制型干预已成为家长普遍采用的育儿策略。本文探讨了限制型干预是通过减少娱乐导向的网络活动来保护青少年心理健康，还是因触发青少年对家长权威的抵抗而加剧抑郁。基于对7,965名初高中学生的问卷数据分析，研究发现，频繁限制有助于减少网络娱乐，进而降低青少年抑郁水平。然而，这种限制同时会激发青少年的权威抵抗，不仅直接损害其心理健康，还导致他们的网络娱乐活动更频繁，从而削弱限制型干预的预期效果。不过，在亲子沟通较好的家庭中，限制型干预能在不触发权威抵抗的情况下显著提升青少年心理健康水平，其保护性作用得以充分发挥。研究揭示了限制型干预效应的双重性与情境依赖性，为优化家庭数字育儿实践提供重要参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the public discourse shaped by the “media risk” narrative, restrictive mediation has become a widely adopted parenting strategy among Chinese families. This study investigates whether restrictive mediation safeguards adolescents’ mental health by curbing entertainmentoriented Internet use or, conversely, exacerbates depression by triggering reactance towards parental authority. Based on survey data from 7,965 adolescents, the results show that frequent restrictions indeed reduce entertainment-oriented Internet use, thereby lowering adolescents’ depression. However, these restrictions also provoke reactance towards parental authority, which not only directly harms mental health but also increases engagement in entertainment-oriented Internet use, undermining the intended protective effects. Notably, in families with better parentchild communication, restrictive mediation can significantly enhance adolescents’ mental health without triggering reactance, allowing its protective effects to prevail. This study highlights the complexity and context-dependency of restrictive mediation effects, offering valuable insights for optimizing digital parenting practices.更多还原