【摘要】 文章从跨文化角度探讨了熊十力量论构思的时代背景、思想资源和创新特色。熊十力创立的新唯识论与旧唯识论存在重大差别，他所构思的量论也与佛教量论有很大不同。这主要表现为熊十力的量论包含“性智”和“量智”两个方面：性智是一种“默然自了”的“证量”,证得通天地万物为一体的本心或本体和生生不息的真机；“量智”是一种“辨物正辞，实测以坚其据”的认知态度和“穷神知化”辩证思维方式。性智与量智虽有不同，不可偏废。我们必须依托性智，开发量智，推进认识能力的转化和提升。为了继承熊十力的遗愿，建构具有中国特色的量论，需要加强研究中国、印度和西洋三方面的认识论和逻辑学说。更多还原

【Abstract】 This article explores the historical context, intellectual resources, and innovative features of Xiong Shili’s conception of Pramā??a-vāda from a cross-cultural perspective. Xiong Shili’s established “New Consciousness-Only” theory differs significantly from the traditional Buddhist Consciousness-Only doctrine, and his envisioned Pramā??a-vāda also greatly differs from its Buddhist counterpart. This is primarily manifested in its inclusion of two aspects: “Intuitive Wisdom”(xingzhi) and “Discursive/Investigative Wisdom”(liangzhi). Intuitive Wisdom is a kind of intuitive self-awareness that realizes the original mind or ontological reality unifying all things and human beings, as well as the true dynamism of constant life generation. Discursive/Investigative Wisdom is a realistic and pragmatic attitude towards cognition, which involves defining concepts through careful discernment of things and supporting evidence through practical measurement. Discursive/Investigative Wisdom is also a dialectical mode of thinking for knowing the transformation of universe. Although Intuitive Wisdom and Discursive/Investigative Wisdom are distinct, neither can be neglected. We must rely on Intuitive Wisdom to develop Discursive/Investigative Wisdom, thereby promoting the transformation and enhancement of our cognitive capacities. To inherit Xiong Shili’s unrealized ambition and construct a Pramā??a-vāda with Chinese characteristics, we need to intensify a cross-cultural research into the epistemologies and logics of China, India, and the West.更多还原