节点文献

基于CIPP评价模式的大学生劳动教育参与评价问卷编制及信效度检验

Compilation and Verification of the Reliability and Validity of the Questionnaire on College Students’ Participation in Labor Education Based on the CIPP Evaluation Model

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王文庆孙艺珊严璐杜娟

【Author】 Wang Wenqing;Sun Yishan;Yan Lu;Du Juan;School of Basic Medicine,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;Student Work Department of the Party Committee,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;School of Marxism,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;

【通讯作者】 杜娟;

【机构】 成都中医药大学基础医学院成都中医药大学党委学生工作部成都中医药大学马克思主义学院

【摘要】 目的:编制基于CIPP评价模式的大学生劳动教育参与评价问卷并检验其信效度,为系统化评估大学生劳动教育参与水平提供工具。方法:以CIPP评价模式中的成果评价作为研究总体框架,以自我决定理论为理论支撑,通过系统的文献研究,基于自我决定理论所提出的自主性、胜任感、关系需求三大核心需求维度,初步梳理并构建评价指标初始题项池,以本科生为样本,通过SPSS完成项目分析、探索性因子分析(EFA)及信度分析,借助AMOS开展验证性因子分析(CFA)检验结构效度。结果:经EFA筛选后,问卷最终保留3维度18题项,累计方差解释率达68.581%;CFA显示模型拟合良好(χ~2/df=3.071,TLI=0.974, CFI=0.978, RMSEA=0.045, SRMR=0.025);总问卷及各维度的Cronbach’s α系数、组合信度均达标,聚合效度与区分效度也符合测量学规范。结论:本问卷信效度良好,符合测量学标准,可作为大学生劳动教育参与水平的测评工具。

【Abstract】 Objective: To develop a questionnaire for evaluating college students’ participation in labor education based on the CIPP evaluation model and test its reliability and validity, providing a tool for systematically assessing the participation level of college students in labor education. Methods: This study takes the outcome evaluation of the CIPP evaluation model as its overall research framework and adopts Self-Determination Theory as the theoretical support. Through a systematic literature review, it initially sorts out and constructs an initial item pool of evaluation indicators based on the three core psychological needs proposed by Self-Determination Theory: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Using undergraduate students as the sample, the study conducts item analysis, exploratory factor analysis(EFA), and reliability analysis via SPSS, and performs confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) with AMOS to test the structural validity. Results: After screening by EFA, the questionnaire consisted of 18 questions in 3 dimensions, and the cumulative variance explanation rate reached 68.581%. CFA shows that the model fits well(χ2/df=3.071, TLI=0.974, CFI=0.978, RMSEA=0.045, SRMR=0.025); The Cronbach’s α coefficients and composite reliability of the total questionnaire and each dimension have all met the standards, and the convergent validity and discriminant validity are also consistent with psychometric norms. Conclusion: This questionnaire has good reliability and validity, conforms to the measurement standards, and can be used as an assessment tool for college students’ participation level in labor education.

【基金】 四川省高等教育人才培养质量和教学改革项目(NO.JG2024-665);四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地四川劳动教育研究中心(NO.SCLD202515);成都大中小学思想政治工作研究基地项目(NO.DZX202521);四川省大学生创新训练计划项目(NO.S202510633092);“杏林春苗”本科生科研启航计划项目(NO.XLCM20250203)
  • 【文献出处】 成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版) ,Journal of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Educational Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2026年01期
  • 【分类号】G641
  • 【下载频次】23
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络