节点文献

中国科学院科技期刊出版伦理建设现状分析及启示

Analysis and enlightenment on the construction of publication ethics in sci-tech journals of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 解贺嘉; 张颖; 唐果媛; 刘筱敏;

【Author】 XIE Hejia;ZHANG Ying;TANG Guoyuan;LIU Xiaomin;School of Publishing,Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication;

【通讯作者】 刘筱敏;

【机构】 北京印刷学院出版学院; 北京大学信息管理系; 北京大学出版研究院; 中国科学院文献情报中心; 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系;

【摘要】 探究中国科学院科技期刊出版伦理规范化建设现状,为构建适用于我国的出版伦理规范体系提供参考。本文采用数据统计分析和内容分析法,梳理了中国科学院科技期刊出版伦理规范化建设的基本情况、出版伦理规范框架以及出版伦理失范行为调查与处理举措。研究指出,现存问题包括科技期刊对出版伦理建设缺乏足够重视、围绕期刊出版全流程的伦理规范不完整、出版伦理失范行为调查处理缺乏规范性。为此,科技期刊需要提升对出版伦理规范化建设的重视程度,建立全面系统的出版伦理规范体系,完善出版伦理失范行为的调查处理程序。

【Abstract】 This paper investigates the current state of publication ethics standardization in sci-tech journals affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences( CAS), aiming to provide foundational references for establishing a domestically applicable publication ethics framework. Through statistical data analysis and qualitative content analysis methodologies, this study examines three core dimensions: the baseline status of publication ethics standardization in CAS journals, the structural composition of existing ethical guidelines, and institutional mechanisms for investigating and addressing ethical violations. Key challenges identified include inadequate emphasis on publication ethics among editorial teams,fragmented ethical norms failing to cover the entire publishing lifecycle,and non-standardized protocols for handling misconduct cases. The findings necessitate that sci-tech journals strengthen systematic attention to ethical standardization, develop comprehensive and operationally coherent ethical frameworks,and establish formalized procedures for the investigation and resolution of publication ethics violations.

【基金】 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2024M750117)
  • 【分类号】G237.5
  • 【下载频次】127
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络