节点文献

中国高等职业教育学术研究的校际科研合作网络分析

Analysis on Inter-university Scientific Collaboration Networks in Academic Research of Higher Vocational Education in China

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李红宇; 周文杰; 王琪; 杨阳;

【Author】 Li Hongyu;Zhou Wenjie;Wang Qi;Yang Yang;the Copying Materials Center of Renmin University of China;the School of Information Resource Management of Renmin University of China;Ningbo University of Vocational & Technical Education;Northwest Normal University;

【机构】 中国人民大学书报资料中心; 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院; 宁波职业技术大学; 西北师范大学;

【摘要】 科研合作是推动知识创新与解决复杂问题的重要方式,也是高校协同创新的关键形式。以人大复印报刊资料《职业技术教育》2022-2024年间的转载文献为数据来源,运用社会网络分析方法,从合作网络结构、度中心性、中介中心性和核心—边缘分布等维度,对高等职业教育研究机构之间的论文发表与合作关系进行系统分析。研究显示,我国该领域学者之间的合作联系仍显薄弱,机构合作多局限于同地域或同校内部分工,跨机构协作较少,尚未形成具有显著影响力的学术集聚体。进一步结构分析表明,合作网络的核心区域以师范类高校为主导,职业院校参与程度有限,反映出职业院校在职业教育学术研究中仍处于跟随状态。为推动职业教育高质量发展,应通过进一步加强研究人员与机构之间的深度协作、着力打造“国家职教科研共同体”升级版、设立学科交叉研究基金等机制,促进高等职业教育研究的协同创新。

【Abstract】 Academic collaboration serves as a vital mechanism for promoting knowledge innovation and addressing complex issues, as well as a key form of collaborative innovation within higher education. Using reprinted articles from the Vocational and Technical Education journal by the Renmin University Copying Materials from 2022 to 2024 as the data source, this study applies social network analysis to systematically examine the publication and collaboration relationships among higher vocational education research institutions from multiple dimensions, including collaborative network structure, degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and core-periphery distribution. The findings reveal that collaborative ties among scholars in this field in China remain relatively weak, with institutional cooperation largely confined to intra-regional or intra-university divisions, and cross-institutional collaboration remaining limited. A significant academic agglomeration has yet to emerge. Further structural analysis indicates that the core of the collaboration network is dominated by normal universities, while vocational colleges exhibit limited participation, reflecting their still peripheral role in academic research on vocational education. To facilitate high-quality development of vocational education, it is recommended to deepen collaboration among researchers and institutions, strengthen the upgraded version of the “National Vocational Education Research Community,” and establish interdisciplinary research funds to promote synergistic innovation in higher vocational education research.

  • 【文献出处】 职业技术教育 ,Vocational and Technical Education , 编辑部邮箱 ,2025年25期
  • 【分类号】G719.2
  • 【下载频次】151
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络