【摘要】 繁荣的市场经济下，为维护合同交易的稳定性和保护债权人的合法利益，《民法典》第581条新增了“替代履行”这一特殊的违约救济措施。由于缺乏相关司法解释，学界关于替代履行规则的争议不断，尤其是关于第581条规定的替代履行的功能定位，进而导致替代履行的具体制度规则难以构建。《民法典》第581条替代履行不是程序法上替代执行的规定，而是一种实体法上的请求权，其也不同于损害赔偿请求权，应从继续履行请求权的角度去理解该规则，并以此为基础从实体和程序两方面完善《民法典》第581条替代履行的制度规则，为法官更好地理解和适用第581条提供理论上的指导。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the prosperous market economy,in order to maintain the stability of the contract transaction and to protect the legitimate interests of creditors,the Article 581 of the Civil Code added the remedy for contract breach,which is “substitute performance”. However,due to the lack of judicial interpretation and the constant argument on the rules in academia,especially on the function and positioning of the substitute performance,the specific rules hasn’t been successfully established yet. Substitute performance is not a procedural alternative to the provisions of alternative performance,but a substantive claim,which is different from the right to claim for damages. It is suggested to interpret the provision from the perspective of the right to specific performance,based on which to improve the rule from both substantive and procedural aspects. This will provide theoretical guidance to the judges for better understanding and application of the Article 581.更多还原