【摘要】 中国传世的汉文古籍中有不少涉及西域或域外史地，其中有大量的西域人名、地名等专有名词，是研究西域史地的重要资料。从19世纪末、20世纪初以来，新疆地区发现了大量的胡语文书，敦煌藏经洞也保存了西域的大量胡语文献，利用这些当地发现的胡语文书，来解读有关西域史地专名，可以为古籍整理校勘时取舍不同汉字写法提供帮助，甚至定论。然而，过去汉文古籍的整理一般注重版本的校勘，很少关注胡语文献研究的成果。本文列举玄奘《大唐西域记》的“汉那”还是“涣那”，《新唐书·地理志》的“蘭城”，《续资治通鉴长编》的“德从太子”，《隋书·西域传》的“代失毕”，《隋书·铁勒传》的“薄落、职乙”等例子，来说明西域出土胡语文献对于汉文古籍整理可以提供的帮助，借以引起古籍整理研究者的注意。更多还原

【Abstract】 Many extant Chinese classics contain accounts of the Western Regions and other foreign lands, recording numerous proper names of people, places and others. These materials constitute important sources for the study of the history and geography of the Western Regions. Since the late 19th and early 20th centuries, many manuscripts in non-Han Chinese languages have been unearthed in Xinjiang 新疆 and Dunhuang 敦煌, providing new evidence for deciphering the proper names of the Western Regions. Such materials can help resolve variant Chinese character renderings found in the ancient texts, and even establish definitive readings. However, the collation of Chinese classical texts in the pasthave emphasized textual variants while paying little attention to the findings of non-Han manuscript studies. This article draws on non-Han Chinese manuscripts as crucial evidence for identifying and correcting the characters used in some proper names in the Western Regions recorded in ancient Chinese sources. Examples include the debate over Huanna 涣那 versus Hanna 汉那 in Xuanzang’s 玄奘 Records of the Western Regions of the Great Tang Dynasty, Lancheng 蘭城 in the Xin Tang Shu 新唐书, Prince Decong 德从太子 in the Long Series of the Renewal of the Ziji Tongjian 续资治通鉴长编, Daishibi 代失毕, Boluo 薄落 and Zhiyi 职乙 in the Sui Shu 隋书. These examples serve to illustrate the contribution of non-Han Chinese manuscripts in the critical edition of Chinese classics, and aim to draw greater scholarly attention to this dimension of research.更多还原