【摘要】 历史文化街区作为城乡文脉载体，其更新需居民深度参与。融合价值共创与地方依恋理论，构建“感知价值—地方依恋—价值共创”模型，基于南京老城南338份居民数据验证发现：感知功能与经济价值通过地方依赖促进参与和公民行为意愿，揭示工具性依赖是物质需求转化行动的通道；情感价值直接驱动两种共创意愿，而地方认同构成公民行为独特路径，凸显在地情感直接转化效应及文化认同对超契约行为的激活；社区支持具双刃效应，既强化经济价值对地方依赖的促进作用，又因干预过度削弱情感价值与地方依赖关联，需平衡工具与情感治理。研究突破经济激励框架，提出文化身份构建、需求分级响应等策略，推动治理向“价值共生”转型，为保护与更新矛盾提供解决路径。更多还原

【Abstract】 Historic and cultural districts serve as vital carriers for the inheritance of urban and rural cultural heritage, and their sustainable renewal urgently requires deep resident participation. This study integrates value co-creation theory and sense of place theory to develop a driving model of participatory renewal: "perceived value-place attachment-value co-creation", examining how multidimensional value perceptions and place attachment shape residents’ engagement mechanisms. Using structural equation modeling analysis of 338 valid questionnaires from Nanjing’s Old South district, the findings reveal three critical pathways. First, residents’ perceived functional value and economic value significantly enhance participation behavior and civic behavioral intentions through the full mediation of place dependence, indicating that instrumental dependence serves as a direct mechanism transforming material needs into actions. Second, perceived emotional value derived from cultural continuity exerts dual effects, directly driving both types of value co-creation intentions and also uniquely activating civic behaviors through the "place identity" pathway. This demonstrates that local emotions rooted in collective memory can bypass institutional constraints to generate spontaneous cultural stewardship. Third, community support exhibits paradoxical moderating effects: while it amplifies the economic value-place dependence linkage, excessive administrative intervention weakens emotional value’s impact on place dependence, revealing tensions between institutional empowerment and grassroots cultural agency. These findings challenge traditional economic incentive paradigms by highlighting the catalytic role of cultural identity and emotional capital. Accordingly, a governance framework is proposed:(1) establishing cultural identity reproduction mechanisms through resident-led heritage interpretation,(2) implementing demand-tiered resource allocation that prioritizes functional necessities like sanitation,(3) developing adaptive community support systems that delineate administrative boundaries in cultural practices. This research contributes to urban governance literature by uncovering the psychosocial process from spatial perception to collective action, while offering practical strategies to reconcile preservation and renovation through value symbiosis.更多还原