【摘要】 在中国城镇化2.0阶段，城市更新构成城市空间发展的主要方式，其本质是提升资源要素配置利用效率、增强空间承载能力、优化城市功能品质与强化城市发展韧性的高质量发展过程。围绕党的“二十届三中全会”确定的“建立可持续的城市更新模式和政策法规”改革发展目标，来自地理学、城乡规划、土地资源管理等领域的15位专家学者，以笔谈的方式从可持续城市更新的概念内涵、价值理念、实施方式与路径、制度政策环境建设及绩效评价方法等不同视角和维度，探讨了建立可持续城市更新模式的理论、方法与路径问题。具体而言：（1）在概念内涵上，可持续城市更新应理解为目标的“可持续性”和实施的“可持续性”。（2）在价值理念上，强调促进多元主体参与并共享收益作为构建可持续城市更新的基本经济理念，同时注重将城市更新融入城市文化遗产空间治理、社会空间治理和生态空间治理，从而形成基于“经济—社会—文化—生态—韧性”多维系统视角组织实施城市更新行动。（3）在实施方式上，必须有效平衡地方政府、市场主体、产权人和社会的利益，注重保障和完善国有企业参与城市更新的机制建设，通过特许经营等新机制吸引社会资本更大参与热情，各方合力推动城市建设从“面向供给”向“面向需求”的模式转变。为满足人民日益增长的美好生活需要，城市更新的实施应更加注重多元参与式设计，注重从人民可感知的微观社区尺度上嵌入公共服务设施、绿色基础设施和数字化技术等要素，统筹城市更新规划编制和管理实施。（4）在制度政策环境建设上，总体上应面向新时代的城市更新产品、治理和模式构建新需求，营造适应性强、可持续的城市更新制度政策环境，特别是要围绕城市更新中“人、地、钱”等关键要素，从用地规制、资金筹措、组织机制等方面进行系统性的体制机制创新。（5）应从“人民视角”出发，构建可度量、可比较的人民城市城市更新绩效评价体系。更多还原

【Abstract】 In China’s urbanization 2.0 phase, urban renewal has become the primary means of urban spatial development. Essentially, it is a high-quality development process aimed at enhancing the efficiency of resource allocation and utilization, strengthening spatial carrying capacity, optimizing urban functional quality, and reinforcing urban development resilience. Centered on the reform and development goal of "establishing a sustainable urban renewal model and policy regulations" set by the Third Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee,15 experts and scholars from fields such as geography, urban and rural planning, and land resource management engaged in written discussions. This exploration spans various perspectives and dimensions, including the conceptual connotation, value concepts, implementation and pathways, institutional policy environment construction, and performance evaluation methods of sustainable urban renewal. Specifically:(1) Conceptual Connotation: Sustainable urban renewal should be understood as both the "sustainability" of goals and the "sustainability" of implementation.(2) Value Concepts: Emphases should be placed on promoting multi-stakeholder participation and benefit-sharing as the fundamental economic philosophy for constructing sustainable urban renewal, as well as integrating urban renewal into the spatial governance of urban cultural heritage, social spatial, and ecological spaces, thereby organizing urban renewal actions from a multidimensional systemic perspective of "economic-social-cultural-ecological-resilience".(3) Implementation: It is crucial to effectively balance the interests of local governments, market entities, property owners, and society. Secondly, attention should be given to ensuring and enhancing the mechanism for state-owned enterprises to participate in urban renewal. Thirdly, new mechanisms should be adopted such as franchising to attract enthusiasm from social capital. With all parties mentioned above, we should transform urban construction from a "supply-oriented" to a "demand-oriented" model. Besides, to meet the people’s growing needs for a better life, urban renewal implementation should focus more on multi-participatory design, embedding public service facilities, green infrastructure, and digital technology elements at the micro-community scale perceptible to the people, and coordinate urban renewal planning and management implementation.(4) Institutional Policy Environment Construction: Overall,there should be a focus on new demands for urban renewal products, governance, and models in the new era, so as to create an adaptive and sustainable institutional policy environment for urban renewal. Particularly, considering key elements such as "people, land, and capital" in urban renewal, systematic institutional innovations should be conducted in aspects like land use regulations, funding arrangements, and organizational mechanisms.(5) Performance Evaluation: Finally, from a "people’s perspective", a measurable and comparable performance evaluation system for urban renewal should be established.更多还原