【摘要】 民事诉讼中的个人信息处理活动广泛存在，涉及起诉、答辩、举证、质证、执行、裁判文书公开等多个环节。民事诉讼中的个人信息处理活动应当适用《个人信息保护法》，自然人之间的个人信息处理活动除外。当事人为完成举证责任提供个人信息的法律依据包括为履行合同所必需、实施人力资源管理所必需、处理合法公开的个人信息等情形。当事人因履行举证责任而处理个人信息不属于《个人信息保护法》第13条第1款第3项规定的为履行法定义务所必需的情形。法院为调查收集证据而处理个人信息，应当遵循合法、必要和目的限制等原则，并采取对个人权益影响最小的方式。外国法院在民事诉讼证据开示程序中要求当事人跨境提供个人信息的，不属于我国《个人信息保护法》第13条第1款第3项中的法定义务。外国法院强制性取得我国境内存储的个人信息，原则上必须通过国际司法协助程序，除非当事人在符合我国法律关于个人信息出境规定的情形下自愿提供。非法处理个人信息的行为严重侵害个人合法权益、违反法律禁止性规定或者严重违背公序良俗的，由此形成或者获取的证据不能作为民事诉讼中认定事实的基础。更多还原

【Abstract】 Personal information processing activities are widespread in civil litigation, encompassing various stages such as initiating a lawsuit, filing an answer, presenting evidence, crossexamining evidence, enforcement, and the public disclosure of judgments. Personal information processing activities in civil litigation should comply with Chinese Personal Information Protection Law(PIPL), with the exception of personal information processing activities between natural persons. The legal bases for parties to provide personal information to fulfill their burden of proof include necessity for the performance of a contract, necessity for human resources management, and processing lawfully disclosed personal information etc.. The processing of personal information by parties to fulfill their burden of proof does not fall under the circumstance of "being necessary for the performance of legal duty" as stipulated in Article 13(1)(3) of PIPL. When a court processes personal information for investigation and evidence collection, it must adhere to principles such as legality, necessity, and purpose-based limitation, and adopt methods that minimize the impact on individuals’ rights and interests. The requirement made by a foreign court for the parties to make the cross-border provision of personal information during the evidence discovery process in civil litigation does not constitute a "legal duty" under Article 13(1)(3) of PIPL. Where a foreign court compulsorily obtains personal information stored within China, it must in principle follow international judicial assistance procedures, unless the parties voluntarily provide such information in compliance with China’s legal provisions on the outbound flow of personal information. If the illegal processing of personal information constitutes a serious infringement of individuals’ lawful rights and interests, violates legal prohibitory provisions, or severely contravenes public order and good morals, the evidence thus obtained or formed cannot be used as the basis for fact finding in civil litigation.更多还原