节点文献
国内外医防协同评价指标体系研究进展
Research progress on evaluation indicator systems for medical-prevention collaboration in China and abroad
【摘要】 目的:查找、筛选、描述和分析国内外医防协同评价指标,为构建适合国内医防协同评价体系提供理论依据和参考。方法:通过检索Web of Science核心库和中国知网从建库到2024年5月31日关于医防协同评价指标的相关文献,制定纳入和排除标准筛选文献,按研究问题提取、分析和总结数据,对评价指标进行归纳分析。结果:最终纳入文献32篇,中文文献15篇,外文文献17篇;涉及3个理论模型、6种指导框架、5种选取方法、6种赋权方法。Donabedian 三维质量模型(6.25%)和耦合协调度模型(6.25%)是使用较多的理论模型,文献研究法(53.13%)和德尔菲法(34.38%)分别是较多的评价指标选取方法和赋权方法;一级指标主要分为组织构架、资源配置和服务质量3类,二级指标中出现频次较高的分别是管理系统、卫生信息系统和患者满意度。结论:目前国内外医防协同评价指标尚不统一,且实证研究较少。今后应该构建一个系统而科学的医防协同评价指标体系,并通过实证研究验证和推行,以促进人民健康和生活质量的提高。
【Abstract】 Objective:To identify,screen,describe,and analyze evaluation indicators for medical-prevention collaboration in China and abroad,providing theoretical basis and reference for constructing a suitable evaluation system in China.Methods:Literature related to evaluation indicators for medical-prevention collaboration was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and CNKI databases up to May 31,2024.Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to screen the literature.Data were extracted,analyzed,and summarized according to research questions,and the evaluation indicators were inductively analyzed.Results:A total of 32 articles were included,comprising 15 in Chinese and 17 in foreign languages.These involved 3 theoretical models,6 guiding frameworks,5 selection methods,and 6 weighting methods.The Donabedian three-dimensional quality model (6.25%) and the coupling coordination degree model (6.25%) were among the most frequently used theoretical models.Literature research method (53.13%) and Delphi method (34.38%) were the most commonly used methods for indicator selection and weighting,respectively.Primary indicators were mainly categorized into organizational structure,resource allocation,and service quality.Among secondary indicators,management systems,health information systems,and patient satisfaction appeared most frequently.Conclusion:Currently,evaluation indicators for medical-prevention collaboration in China and abroad are not unified,and empirical studies are scarce.In the future,a systematic and scientific evaluation indicator system should be constructed and validated through empirical research to promote improvements in public health and quality of life.
【Key words】 medical-prevention collaboration; medical-prevention integration; evaluation indicators; evaluation system;
- 【文献出处】 中国医院 ,Chinese Hospitals , 编辑部邮箱 ,2025年07期
- 【分类号】R197.1
- 【下载频次】103