【摘要】 “中文+”理念自2019年提出后便广受关注，但学界对其内涵与外延的理解却存在明显分歧，特别是对其与传统的专门用途汉语教学之间的关系的认识不清，造成滥用“中文+”概念的情况。从已有研究和实践来看，对二者之间关系的理解可以概括为3种：前者相当于后者；前者包括后者；前者可以不包括后者。但二者并非同一层面上的概念。从专用语教学理论与实践来看，专用汉语教学是单纯从专业和课程教学层面总结出来的理念和模式，针对的是具体的语言知识与技能教学。而“中文+”是从国际中文教育事业发展的宏观层面提出的新理念，是中国教育领域改革创新发展的战略指导思想和政策，其核心精神是将国际中文教育与职业、专业教育更广泛、深入地结合，推动中国职业与专业教育国际化，培养既懂中文又有专业知识与技能的国际人才。“中文+”项目中可以包含专用汉语课程及资源等，但不是专用汉语教学的替代。不应滥用“中文+”，尤其不应以之代指商务汉语类专用汉语教学。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the proposal of the "Chinese+" concept in 2019,it has attracted considerable attention.However,there is a clear divergence in understanding its connotation and denotation,particularly its relationship with Chinese for Specific Purposes(CSP) language teaching.Scholars hold different views over the relationship between "Chinese+" and CSP language teaching.Some believe that the former is equivalent to the latter,while some think that the former subsumes the latter,and others argue that the former does not subsume the latter.Considering the misunderstandings and misuse of the "Chinese+" concept,this study aims to define the "Chinese+" concept and clarify its relationship with CSP language teaching.Drawing on the theoretical framework of CSP language teaching,this paper examines the connections and distinctions between "Chinese+" and CSP.It posits that "Chinese+" constitutes a more advanced macro-policy concept.Its central ethos lies in the broader and deeper integration of international Chinese Education with Vocational and Professional Education,thereby advancing the internationalization of Chinese Vocational and Professional Education systems and cultivating international professionals who are proficient in Chinese and possess specialized knowledge and skills.CSP,as an academic construct,is oriented towards the professional or academic purposes of learners.Therefore,these two concepts should not be conflated.更多还原