节点文献

自动化行政法律风险规制研究

Research on the Governance of Legal Risks in Algorithmic Administration

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 梁三利; 张灵捷;

【Author】 LIANG Sanli;ZHANG Lingjie;Department of Law and Politics,Party School of C.P.C Jiangsu Committee;

【机构】 中共江苏省委党校法政教研部;

【摘要】 自动化行政作为人工智能技术驱动的政府治理新模式,在数字法治政府建设中发展迅速,显著提升了执法效能并维护了社会秩序稳定。但其也会带来算法权利滥用、程序正义缺失、公民合法权益受损、责任确定困难等法律风险。因此,为了维护社会秩序和保障公民权益,需要从加强自动化行政内部规制、补正自动化行政程序、强化公民权利保障、完善法律责任承担机制等路径防范自动化行政法律风险,从而使自动化行政符合自然正义的基本要求,实现数字时代的依法行政。

【Abstract】 As a new model of government governance driven by artificial intelligence technology, automated administration has rapidly developed in the construction of a digital rule-of-law government, significantly enhancing law enforcement efficiency and maintaining social order. However, it has also given rise to legal risks such as the abuse of algorithmic power, absence of procedural justice, harm to citizens’ legitimate rights and interests, and difficulties in determining accountability. Therefore, to uphold social order and protect citizens’ rights, it is necessary to regulate the legal risks of algorithmic administration through measures such as strengthening internal oversight of automated administration, rectifying administrative procedures, reinforcing safeguards for citizens’ rights, and improving mechanisms for legal liability allocation. This will ensure that automated administration aligns with the fundamental requirements of natural justice and achieves law-based governance in the digital era.

【基金】 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX24_4193)
  • 【文献出处】 盐城工学院学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology(Social Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2025年05期
  • 【分类号】D922.1
  • 【下载频次】61
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络