【摘要】 本文从谎言的内涵入手，着重探讨了谎言的界定、新类型和研究方法，简要介绍了当前该领域研究的热点。在此基础上，论文分析了语言学视域下谎言研究的局限性，并对未来趋势做出展望。研究表明，谎言的界定已从“欺骗断言”式的语言哲学范式转向语义和语用视角的动态建构；尤其是新型谎言，即虚假隐涵式谎言、明目张胆式谎言、白色谎言的出现对语言哲学范式的谎言界定提出了挑战。另外，随着谎言研究方法的不断丰富，实验语用学研究中常用的在线及非在线实证方法，有效推动了对新类别谎言的验证研究，进一步强化了人们对谎言本质的认知。通过对既往文献的梳理与总结，本文进一步明晰了当下研究的局限，并明确指出传统谎言研究针对功能类或形式类的单向、线性分析缺乏整体观，无法再现谎言行为的动态复杂性。最后，论文对谎言研究的前景进行展望，建议在语用修辞视角下重塑谎言的内涵，将谎言的社会语用功能实现与语言形式选择纳入统一框架进行系统性整合。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper begins with an examination of the connotation of lying, and focuses on the review of lying studies from three aspects:the definitions, the categories, and research methods of lying, based on which the paper analyzes the limitations of linguistic research on lying and offers an outlook on the future trends. The study finds that the definition of lying has shifted from the traditional paradigm of lying as“deceptive assertions”toward a dynamic constructivism under semantic/pragmatic perspective; bald-faced lie, white lie and false-implicature lie have been identified, challenging the traditional paradigm of lying; research methods of lying are diversified, moving beyond traditional philosophical approach to empirical approaches such as online and offline experimental pragmatics, which validates the recently emerging categories of lying and substantially deepens the understanding of the nature of lying. Then, it points out the limitations in current research of lying:prior research has predominantly confined itself to unidirectional analyses focusing either on the functional or formal aspects of lying, which lacks an integrative perspective and fails to capture the dynamic complexities in lying. Finally, this study proposes a new pathway for lying studies by adopting a pragmatic-rhetorical approach. It aims to reconceptualize lying by providing a unified analysis of the pragmatic functions of lying and their linguistic realizations.更多还原