节点文献

上海市运动健康城市评价指标体系的构建

The construction of an evaluation index system for sports and health cities in Shanghai

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 冯泽昀胡善联范小红沈银忠周秋瑞熊静吴卫兵钟仁耀高向东夏妍春于一凡惠晶晶曹杰袁涛金春林

【Author】 FENG Zeyun;HU Shanlian;FAN Xiaohong;SHEN Yinzhong;ZHOU Qiurui;XIONG Jing;WU Weibing;ZHONG Renyao;GAO Xiangdong;XIA Yanchun;YU Yifan;HUI Jingjing;CAO Jie;YUAN Tao;JIN Chunlin;Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center;School of Public Health, Fudan University;Training Bureau, General Administration of Sport of China;Shanghai University of Sport;School of Public Administration, East China Normal University;Shanghai Polytechnic University;College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University;Shanghai Health Development Research Center (Shanghai Medical Information Center);

【通讯作者】 范小红;金春林;

【机构】 上海市公共卫生临床中心复旦大学公共卫生学院国家体育总局训练局上海体育大学华东师范大学公共管理学院上海第二工业大学同济大学建筑与城市规划学院上海市卫生和健康发展研究中心(上海市医学科学技术情报研究所)

【摘要】 目的 构建一套符合上海市超大城市特征、兼具科学性与操作性的运动健康城市评价指标体系,响应健康中国战略。方法 以“健康行为改变整合理论”为基础,通过文献分析法获得运动健康城市评价体系初始指标44项;运用模糊德尔菲法和模糊层次分析法,设计问卷并函询专家,筛选专家意见;采用Cronbach’s α系数评估专家评分数据的内部一致性,通过KMO检验与Bartlett球形检验验证指标体系的理论适配性。结果 经过两轮专家咨询筛选与一致性检验,最终构建了包含3个一级指标、11个二级指标、37个三级指标的上海市运动健康城市评价指标体系,3个一级指标(运动健康治理、健康赋能型城市环境、社会健康生态)的权重占比分别为20%、50%、30%。结论 基于“运动健康治理—健康赋能型城市环境—社会健康生态”三维框架构建的上海市运动健康城市评价指标体系,衔接国家战略,平衡制度刚性与环境柔性,为高密度城市健康治理提供范式。

【Abstract】 Objective To construct a scientifically rigorous and operationally feasible evaluation index system for sports and health cities, tailored to the characteristics of Shanghai as a megacity, in response to the Healthy China initiative. Methods Based on the“Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change”, this study used a literature review to identify an initial set of 44 indicators for the evaluation index system. Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method(FDM) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process(FAHP), questionnaires were designed and then distributed to experts for feedbacks, which was used to iteratively revise the indicators. The internal consistency of expert ratings was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient. The index system’s theoretical fit was validated with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO) test and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity. Results Through two rounds of expert consultation, screening, and consistency testing, the study constructs an evaluation index system for Shanghai, consisting of 3 first-level, 11 second-level, and 37 third-level indicators. The weights for the three first-level indicators—Sport-Health Governance, Health-Enabling Urban Environment, and Social Health Ecology—are 20%, 50%, and 30%, respectively. Conclusion The proposed three-dimensional evaluation framework—“Sport-Health Governance, Health-Enabling Urban Environment, and Social Health Ecology”—aligns with national strategies, balances institutional rigidity with environmental flexibility, and provides a paradigm for health governance in densely populated cities.

【基金】 上海市浦江人才计划(22PJC096)
  • 【文献出处】 健康发展与政策研究 ,Health Development and Policy Research , 编辑部邮箱 ,2025年04期
  • 【分类号】R193
  • 【下载频次】103
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络