【摘要】 气候变化作为一类新型非传统安全问题，具有跨国性、代际性等基本特征。基于气候变化问题的强风险属性，借助刑法手段加强气候治理既是现实形势所迫，亦是可持续发展之需。通过累积犯的路径将气候负担行为作为犯罪处理是现代风险预防原则指引下的必然选择，气候累积犯的刑事责任仍未脱离个人责任的范畴，符合罪责自负等原则的基本限定。气候累积犯的刑法规制首先要确立明确的认定标准，气候负担行为侵犯的法益是地球大气与人类生态利益；在因果关系证明上，疫学因果关系论能够简化行为与潜在损害的证明要求；在刑事归责的实定法基础上，要从解释论的立场对污染环境罪加以适度扩张，气候负担行为完全符合污染环境罪的对象范围以及行为构造。在应然维度，宜结合碳排放配额等指标动态设定风险临界阈值，顺利实现行政责任与刑事责任的区分与衔接。此外，宜加快《生态环境法典》等综合性法律立法进程，科学设定行为罪状与罪责条款。更多还原

【Abstract】 As a new type of non-traditional security issue, climate change is characterized by transnational, transgenerational and other fundamental attributes. Given the high-risk nature of climate change, strengthening climate governance through criminal law instruments is not only a practical imperative, but also a requirement for sustainable development. Treating climate burden behaviors as criminal offenses through the framework of cumulative offenses is an inevitable choice guided by the modern precautionary principle. The criminal liability for climate cumulative offenses remains within the realm of individual responsibility, which is consistent with fundamental constraints such as the principle of Bearing Responsibility Solely for One’s Own Crime. Criminal regulation of climate cumulative offenses must first establish clear identification criteria: the legal interests infringed upon by climate burden behaviors are the Earth’s atmosphere and human ecological interests. Regarding the proof of causal relationship, the epidemiological causality theory can simplify the burden of proof for linking behaviors to potential harms. Based on the positive law basis for criminal imputation, the crime of environmental pollution should be appropriately expanded from an interpretive perspective, as climate burden behaviors fully conform to the scope of objects and behavioral structure stipulated by this offense. In the normative dimension, it is advisable to dynamically set risk critical thresholds based on indicators such as carbon emission allowances, thereby smoothly achieving the distinction and connection between administrative liability and criminal liability. Additionally, it is advisable to accelerate the process of comprehensive legislation such as the Code of Ecological Environment, and scientifically define the statutory elements of conduct and culpability provisions.更多还原