节点文献

海上风电筒型基础承载力简化算法适用性研究

RESEARCH ON APPLICABILITY OF SIMPLIFIED BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION METHOD FOR BUCKET FOUNDATIONS FOR OFFSHORE WIND POWER

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张浩侯晋芳刘润汪嘉钰孙若晗

【Author】 Zhang Hao;Hou Jinfang;Liu Run;Wang Jiayu;Sun Ruohan;Institute of Ocean Energy and Intelligent Construction,Tianjin University of Technology;CCCC Coastal Engineering Key Laboratory of Hydrodynamics;CCCC Tianjin Port Engineering Institute Co.,Ltd.;State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation,Tianjin University;

【通讯作者】 汪嘉钰;

【机构】 天津理工大学海洋能源与智能建设研究院中交集团海岸工程水动力重点实验室中交天津港湾工程研究院有限公司天津大学水利工程智能建设与运维全国重点实验室

【摘要】 采用数值分析方法探讨不同深径比筒型基础在竖向、滑动和倾覆荷载作用下的承载特性,对比分析汉森公式、墩式深基础公式、基于土压力理论的抗滑承载力计算方法和数值计算结果之间的差异,从而明确3种计算方法的适用范围。结果表明:汉森公式法计算的竖向承载力与数值计算结果具有良好的一致性,且优于墩式深基础公式法;基于土压力理论的抗滑承载力算法与基于墩式深基础公式的抗倾承载力算法仅对深径比为0.25~1.00的筒型基础具有较好适用性。

【Abstract】 Numerical analysis has been conducted to examine the bearing characteristics of bucket foundations with various embedment ratios under vertical, sliding, and overturning loads. Comparative analyses between the results obtained from the Hansen formula, the caisson deep foundation formula, earth pressure-based calculation methods, and numerical simulations have elucidated the applicability ranges of these methodologies. The findings demonstrate that the vertical bearing capacity calculations using the Hansen formula align closely with the numerical analysis results, surpassing those obtained through the caisson deep foundation formula. Additionally, it was determined that the anti-slide and anti-overturning bearing capacity calculations based on earth pressure theory and the caisson deep foundation formula respectively are appropriate only for bucket foundations with embedment ratios ranging from 0.25 to 1.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金联合重点基金(U21A20164);国家杰出青年科学基金(51825904)
  • 【文献出处】 太阳能学报 ,Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica , 编辑部邮箱 ,2025年09期
  • 【分类号】TU476;TM614
  • 【下载频次】27
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络