节点文献
人工智能时代国家认知安全的风险解析与治理研究
Research on Risk Analysis and Governance of National Cognitive Security in the Era of AI
【摘要】 随着人工智能时代的深入发展,认知安全已成为国家安全和国际政治博弈中的重要议题。然而,既有研究大多将认知安全风险的生成机制聚焦于技术优势国对信息的阻断和封锁,导致对人工智能技术所引发的国家认知安全风险机制的研究过于单一,且论证不足。基于网络化相互依赖理论,将“技术优势国—人工智能技术—目标国”之间的相互依赖关系作为研究对象,聚焦技术优势国实施认知攻击的内在机制。核心论点是,技术优势国为维持其在非对称相互依赖关系中的优势地位,会策略性地选择并运用控制机制、嵌入机制和杠杆机制实施认知攻击。具体而言,控制机制以显性、强硬的手段直接实施认知操控;嵌入机制则以隐形、渐进的方式,让目标国在潜移默化中面临意识渗透和数字殖民;杠杆机制则意在挑动或加剧目标国与其他国家之间的矛盾,使其国家形象受到污名化攻击。鉴于此,为有效应对人工智能技术发展带来的新的认知安全风险,需构建与之相匹配的治理方案。
【Abstract】 With the in-depth development of the era of artificial intelligence(AI), cognitive security has become an important issue in national security and international political games. However, most existing studies have narrowly focused on the generation mechanism of cognitive security risks on the blocking and blockade of information by countries with technological advantages, resulting in overly simplistic research on the national cognitive security risk mechanism triggered by AI technology and insufficient argumentation. Based on the theory of networked interdependence, the interdependence relationship among “technologically dominant countries-AI technology-target countries” is taken as the research object, focusing on the internal mechanisms of cognitive attacks carried out by technologically dominant countries. The core argument is that technological advantage countries, in order to maintain their dominant position in asymmetric interdependent relationships, will strategically choose and employ control mechanisms, embedding mechanisms, and leverage mechanisms to carry out cognitive attacks. Specifically, the control mechanism directly implements cognitive manipulation through explicit and forceful means; the embedding mechanism, in an invisible and gradual way, enables the target country to face consciousness infiltration and digital colonization imperceptibly; while the leverage mechanism aims to trigger or intensify the conflicts between target countries and other countries, thereby subjecting its national image to stigmatization attacks. In view of this, to effectively address the new cognitive security risks brought about by the timely development of AI, it is necessary to construct a governance solution that matches them.
【Key words】 artificial intelligence; national cognitive security; country with technological advantage; target country;
- 【文献出处】 信息安全与通信保密 ,Information Security and Communications Privacy , 编辑部邮箱 ,2025年12期
- 【分类号】D631;TP18
- 【下载频次】16