【摘要】 [目的/意义]新质生产力是先进生产力的演进方向，而开放科学则代表第四代科学研究范式的典型特征。探讨开放科学在新质生产力发展中的融合逻辑、助推机制与实践路径，从而弥补新质生产力现有研究中在知识生产中观视角上的不足。[方法/过程]运用逻辑分析与比较研究的方法，从开放科学和新质生产力的概念内涵出发，探讨两者在发展逻辑、工具理性和价值理性上的一致性。[结果/结论]研究指出，开放科学通过知识共享提升劳动力素质，通过科技创新促进劳动对象的跃升，并通过科研合作推动劳动资料的变革，从而为新质生产力的发展提供了有效的运行机制。为促进新质生产力发展，需以开放式知识和开放式对话推动科研模式变革；借助公民开放式参与和开放科学能力培训，实现价值理性的提升；同时，应探索开放科学与人工智能的共生发展，以促进工具理性的进步。研究通过深入探讨开放科学在新质生产力发展中的核心价值及实施策略，丰富现有理论研究，并为后续研究提供理论基础和实践指导。更多还原

【Abstract】 [Purpose/Significance] New quality productive forces represent the evolutionary direction of advanced productivity, and open science is a typical representative of the fourth generation of scientific research paradigm. Exploring the integration logic, boosting mechanism and practice path of open science on the development of new quality productive forces can make up for the shortcomings of new quality productivity research from the perspective of knowledge production. [Method/Process] Using the logical analysis and comparative research,this study probed into the consistency of development logic, instrumental rationality and value rationality of open science and new quality productive forces based on their concept connotation. [Result/Conclusion] It reveals that open science provided an effective operational mechanism for the development of new quality productivity by improving the quality of labor force through knowledge sharing, promoting the improvement of labor object through scientific and technological innovation, and driving the reform of labor data through scientific research cooperation.It posits that fostering an ecosystem of open knowledge and dialogue, encouraging broad-based citizen engagement and scientific capabilities, and nurturing a symbiotic relationship between open science and artificial intelligence are pivotal for remolding research modalities, enhancing value rationality, and amplifying instrumental rationality.Through a comprehensive discourse on the core virtues and operative frameworks of open science in buttressing the development of new quality productive forces, this paper not only augments existing theoretical discourse but also lays a foundational cornerstone for ensuing scholarly inquiry.更多还原