【摘要】 减刑、假释作为我国刑罚执行变更的两大核心制度，不仅关乎刑罚的公正性，更涉及社会的安全与稳定，是实现社会公正的关键环节。当前，减刑和假释程序虽然在法律框架上已初具规模，但在实际运行中仍存在诸多问题，对制度的实施效果造成了影响。相关改革举措未能全面锚定并解决减刑、假释程序存在的固有弊病，存在“重实体、轻程序”，“重实际效果、轻权利保障”之嫌，应对减刑、假释程序进行系统性的改革与完善。减刑、假释程序的系统性改革应遵循程序法定原则、人权保障原则与权力制约原则，完成从“奖励说”到“权利说”的逻辑转变，立足“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革之大局，实现法律规范的系统性调整、程序运行的系统性重塑和主体权责的系统性配置。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the two core systems of penalty execution modification in China, commutation and parole are not only related to the justice of penalty, but also related to the security and stability of society, which serve as the key link to realize social justice. At present, although the procedure of sentence reduction and parole has begun to take shape in the legal framework, many problems have cropped up in practice, which affects the implementation effect of the system. The relevant reform measures have failed to comprehensively anchor and solve the inherent drawbacks of the commutation and parole procedures, exhibiting tendencies such as “prioritizing substance over procedure” and “emphasizing practical outcomes over rights protection”. Therefore, systematic reform and improvement of commutation and parole procedures are imperative. The systematic reform of commutation and parole procedures should adhere to the principles of procedural legality, human rights protection, and power restraint. It must realize a logical shift from the “reward theory” to the “right theory”, align with the broader context of litigation system reform centering on “trial-centered adjudication”, and achieve systematic adjustments in legal norms, systematic reshaping of procedural operations and systematic allocation of authority and responsibilities among relevant entities.更多还原