【摘要】 近年来,督查作为一种强化政策执行的治理机制,日益成为国家治理体系的重要组成部分。本研究将督查理解为领导注意力对执行注意力的调动,基于注意力的宽广度、稳定度、集中度等3个维度,构建注意力驱动的分析框架。研究发现,依托督查清单分类定责、督查组追踪施压、集体拉练排名竞争等要素,督查构建了一套注意力驱动的制度化模式,即缓解层级注意力不匹配的注意力引导机制、应对注意力漂移与偏差的注意力控制机制、强化压力感知的注意力动员机制。县级决策层借助注意力驱动的3重机制,推动县域体制高速运转。然而,县域治理过度依赖督查可能引发督查泛化,进而导致注意力焦虑和督查悖论的出现。在注意力有限性视角下,要适度限制督查的范围、频次、强度,维持基层主次分明、快慢平衡的治理节奏。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years,supervision,as a governance mechanism to strengthen policy implementation,has increasingly become an important component of the national governance system.This study conceptualizes supervision as the mobilization of executive attention by leadership attention,and constructs an attention-driven analytical framework based on three dimensions:breadth,stability,and concentration of attention.The research finds that,through elements such as responsibility assignment via categorized supervision lists,pressure application by supervision teams,and collective ranking competition,supervision establishes an institutionalized model driven by attention.This includes:an attention guidance mechanism to alleviate hierarchical attention mismatch,an attention control mechanism to address attention drift and deviation,and an attention mobilization mechanism to enhance pressure perception.Utilizing these three attention-driven mechanisms,county-level decision-makers propel the county-level system into high-speed operation.However,over-reliance on supervision in county governance may lead to the generalization of supervision,consequently causing attention anxiety and the emergence of a supervision paradox.From the perspective of limited attention,it is necessary to appropriately restrict the scope,frequency,and intensity of supervision to maintain a community-level governance rhythm that distinguishes primary from secondary tasks and balances urgency with deliberation.更多还原