【摘要】 跨学科对话困难的“科学巴别塔”现象，阻碍了社会科学研究的知识积累。建构共同语言是解决这一困境的基本途径，其中发展通用框架是最富成效的探索之一。通用框架能够为不同学科的研究提供统一的分析基础，通过加强跨学科的理论对话促进知识的有效积累。研究梳理了社会科学领域共同语言建构的理论探索，并以布卢明顿学派为例，总结通用框架的发展进程与实践成效。作为通用框架发展的典型范例，诺贝尔经济学奖得主埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆(Elinor Ostrom)领衔的布卢明顿学派提出的制度分析框架，在推动制度与人类行为方向的跨学科研究和知识积累方面取得了显著成效。回顾过去四十年制度分析框架取得的进展和面临的挑战，可以为社会科学中的通用框架发展乃至共同语言建构，提供重要的借鉴和启示。中国学者重视和加强通用框架和共同语言的开发和应用，有助于加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学。更多还原

【Abstract】 The lack of communication among various disciplines, or the “Scientific Tower of Babel”, has hindered the knowledge accumulation of social sciences. Building up a common language is the basic approach to solve this dilemma, among which developing a common framework is one of the most fruitful explorations. The common framework can provide a unified analytical basis for the research of different disciplines and promote knowledge accumulation by strengthening interdisciplinary communication. This article systematically reviews theoretical explorations of common language construction in social sciences and examines the development process and practical effectiveness of common frameworks through a case study of the Bloomington School. As a typical example of common framework, the institutional analysis frameworks proposed by the Bloomington School has achieved remarkable achievements in promoting interdisciplinary dialogue and knowledge accumulation on institution and human behavior. Reviewing the progress and challenges in the development of institutional analysis frameworks in the past 40 years can provide important enlightenment and inspiration for the development of common framework and common language in social sciences. Chinese scholars should attach importance to the development and application of common framework and common language, which will facilitate the development of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.更多还原