节点文献
帝国主义、生态帝国主义与绿色帝国主义
Imperialism, Ecological Imperialism, and Green Imperialism: An Overview
【摘要】 文章旨在探讨帝国主义与政治生态学之间的关系,剖析生态帝国主义历史演变的特征,并在生物物理威胁日益加剧的背景下,揭示其表面适应性调整即绿色帝国主义的生态社会影响。基于世界体系分析理论,文章首先对帝国主义作出简明扼要的新定义:将其理解为全球资本主义的经济支配体系,该体系将中心国家置于劳动力、能源和物质资源攫取的一极,而将外围国家置于资源供给的对立极。这种等级化结构揭示出,生态帝国主义实质上是中心国家在全球范围内实施的一系列外部化转嫁行为,将外围地区改造成为这些外部化压力的倾倒场。在此过程中,绿色帝国主义作为一种新型积累模式出现,通过所谓环境友好政策与话语的合法化包装,旨在维系中心国家的帝国式生活方式。文章最后指出,必须建立生态不平等交换批判理论与当代去增长激进立场之间的建设性对话,以此削减最具破坏性的生产部门,并推动全球南方实现社会公正的转型与发展。
【Abstract】 This article aims to explore the relationship between imperialism and political ecology, the identifying characteristics of the historical development of ecological imperialism, and the ecosocial implications of its cosmetic adaptation-namely, green imperialism-in a context of growing threat and biophysical concern. We first provide a succinct updated definition of imperialism based on world-systems analysis, which serves to understand imperialism as the system of economic domination of global capitalism, placing countries at the core of the system at one pole of extraction of labor, energy, and material resources, and those at the periphery at the opposite pole of supply. This hierarchization helps to understand ecological imperialism as a series of externalizations that the core tends to implement globally, transforming the periphery into a drain for these externalizations. As part of it, green imperialism appears as a new mode of accumulation aimed at preserving the imperial mode of living in the core legitimized by supposedly environmentally beneficial policies and discourses. We conclude by addressing the need for a fruitful dialogue between the critiques of ecologically unequal exchange and the radical positions of contemporary degrowth in order to reduce the most harmful productive sectors and favor a socially just transition and development in the Global South.
- 【文献出处】 鄱阳湖学刊 ,Journal of Poyang Lake , 编辑部邮箱 ,2025年03期
- 【分类号】X22;F113
- 【下载频次】66