【摘要】 在裁判理论上，社科法学将法教义学曲解为特定的“法条主义”版本，反对机械的法律适用，主张普遍的后果考量，从而将“规则至上”与“后果考量”对立起来。但是，经过评价法学的改造，法教义学实现自我进阶，已经不同于法条主义。法教义学将后果导向作为法律解释的基本姿态，将解释性论据与政策性论据相互协调，基于原则权衡进行后果评价从而实现后果评价的规范化，并将后果考量纳入价值判断体系化建构的过程之中。因此，法教义学已经通过教义驯化了后果，从而防范了越法裁判的风险。更多还原

【Abstract】 In adjudication theory, social science-oriented legal studies often misconstrue legal dogmatics as a particular form of “statutory formalism”, opposing mechanical application of the law and advocating for universal consideration of consequences, thereby positioning “rule supremacy” against “consequence consideration”. However, through the transformation effected by evaluative jurisprudence, legal Dogmatics has advanced beyond statutory formalism. Legal Dogmatics adopts a consequence-oriented approach as a fundamental posture in legal interpretation, coordinating interpretive and policy arguments. By evaluating consequences through principled balancing, it achieves the normalization of consequence assessment and incorporates such considerations into the systematic construction of value judgments. In this way, legal doctrine has effectively “tamed” consequences, mitigating the risk of judgments that exceed the law.更多还原