【摘要】 AIGC法律定性的分析路径，应厘清如下关系：规范分析与价值分析、客体与主体、人本主义理念及其基本范畴体系的坚守与突破。作品肯定说对智力成果、独创性的解读偏离了两个要件的关系及其核心要义。作品的第一要件是智力成果，而非独创性。智力成果的含义是“表达”，而非“智力投入”。独创性的含义是“独立创作”，而非“可识别性差异”。AIGC生成前，模型用户（人）输入的提示词、参数属于二分法中的思想，设计提示词不是创作。AI模型的非工具技术属性决定了AIGC是AI自动生成的算法创作成果，属于AI制品而非人类作品。为保持法律体系价值导向的统一性，维护学术诚信，不能把AI算法创作成果归属于人类智力创作成果。更多还原

【Abstract】 The analytical pathway for the legal qualification of AIGC(Artificial Intelligence Generated Content)should clarify the following relationships: normative analysis versus value analysis, object versus subject, as well as humanistic principles and the adherence to and breakthrough of their basic categorical system. The affirmative argument about taking AIGC as human work deviates from the relationship and core essence of the two essential elements in its interpretation of intellectual achievements and originality. The primary element of human work is intellectual achievement,rather than originality. The meaning of intellectual achievement is “expression”, not “intellectual input”. The meaning of originality is “independent creation”, not “recognizable difference”. Before AIGC is generated, the prompt words and parameters input by the model user(human) belong to the idea in the dichotomy, and designing prompt words does not constitute creation. The non-instrumental technical attribute of AI models determines that AIGC is an algorithmically created output generated automatically by AI, belonging to AI products rather than human works. To maintain the unity of the value orientation of the legal system and uphold academic integrity, AI algorithmically created outputs cannot be attributed to human intellectual creations.更多还原