【摘要】 责任鸿沟问题既是一个哲学问题，也是人工智能时代下，社会要面临的一个巨大的责任困境。然而，目前关于责任鸿沟问题的产生条件还不明确，解决方法尚不成熟。通过对责任鸿沟收缩论的回应和反驳，责任鸿沟应有两个条件，其一是制造者没有关于智能机器负载价值的行为的知识可及性，其二是人们对智能机器负载价值的行为有责任归因的欲望。结合这两种条件，除了目前从“事前”视角出发的法律、技术和伦理治理外，责任鸿沟应当存在第二类关于大众责任欲望的“事后”解决。更多还原

【Abstract】 The responsibility gap is not only a philosophical problem, but also a major responsibility issue faced by society in the era of artificial intelligence. However, at present, the conditions for the responsibility gap remain unclear, and the approaches to addressing it are still underdeveloped. In response to and in refutation of deflationism about the responsibility gap, it has been argued that the existence of a responsibility gap requires two conditions: the first is that manufacturers do not have epistemic access to the value-laden behaviors of intelligent machines; the second is that people are inclined to attribute responsibility for the value-laden behaviors of intelligent machines. Taken together, these two conditions suggest that, in addition to existing legal, technical, and ethical governance from the “ex-ante” perspective, there should also be a second type of “ex-post” solution to the responsibility gap concerning the public’s inclination to attribute responsibility.更多还原