【摘要】 赵州坝子的地理环境为多民族社群的风土聚落及其建筑空间的形成与演化提供了多样化的可能性。本研究以赵州坝子的风土聚落与建筑为例,借鉴人类学家提出的“坝子社会”概念作为研究视角,并结合“社会记忆”研究方法,对地域性建筑空间的社会生成机制进行探讨。本研究结合了GIS图像分析、社会记忆指标调查、口述访谈以及来自明清时期的地方历史资料,包括地方志、历史地图和图示,并结合民国时期的数据,深入调查了赵州坝子的典型聚落。研究最终提出了一种“记忆深描法则”,即“聚落地理记忆”、“公共庙宇记忆”以及“风土住屋记忆”,由三个要素构成:研究对象(聚落空间、公共庙宇、风土住屋)、分析维度(空间格局、文化实践、集体记忆)、叙事方法(口述资料、图示描绘、量化指标),从而为其应用提供了清晰的结构框架,并对“坝子社会”的研究路径进行可行性分析。研究结果如下:(1)基于田野调查与GIS、史料三重互证,151份有效问卷提取出5个主要记忆因子(共同度>0.8,累计方差贡献率85.66%),验证了“记忆厚描”框架的可操作性与量化有效性。(2)赵州坝子各类聚落呈现出显著的地形—功能—记忆耦合规律,揭示出权力结构与空间形态在社会记忆中的持续重构。(3)公共庙宇在功能转型中仍维系社区精神核心,成为集体记忆的显性载体,体现出生产生活记忆的物质延续。结果表明,社会记忆在地理环境、社会实践与风土建筑空间之间形成关键中介机制,为理解坝区聚落的演化逻辑与文化遗产更新提供了新的理论与方法支撑。更多还原

【Abstract】 The geographical environment of the Zhaozhou Basin provides diverse possibilities for the formation and evolution of vernacular settlements and architectural spaces within multi-ethnic communities. Taking the vernacular settlements and architecture of the Zhaozhou Basin as a case study, this research adopts the anthropological concept of the “Bazi Society” as an analytical framework, and integrates the methodology of “social memory” to explore the social mechanisms that shape regional architectural space. By utilizing the “social memory” research approach, this study integrates GIS image analysis, social memory indicator surveys, oral interviews, and local historical materials from the Ming and Qing Dynasties, including local chronicles, historical maps, and illustrations, along with data from the Republican era, to conduct an in-depth investigation of typical settlements in the Zhaozhou Basin. This study proposes a “rule of in-depth memory depiction”, which is structured around three elements: the research objects(settlement spaces, public temples, and vernacular dwellings), the analytical dimensions(spatial patterns, cultural practices, and collective memory), and the narrative methods(oral testimony, schematic mapping, and quantitative indicators), thereby providing a clear framework for its application. It analyzes the feasibility of the research pathway for the “Bazi Society of basins”. The results can be summarized in three points.(1) Based on field investigation and GIS-historical triangulation, 151 valid questionnaires yielded five principal memory factors(communalities > 0.8; cumulative variance contribution rate 85.66%), thus verifying the operational feasibility and quantitative validity of the “Thick Description of Memory” framework.(2) Settlements in the Zhaozhou Basin exhibit a significant “landform-function-memory coupling pattern”, which reveals the continuous reconstruction of power structures and spatial forms within the processes of social memory.(3) Despite their functional transformations, public temples continue to serve as the spiritual cores of communities and as explicit carriers of collective memory, so they reflect the material continuity of productive and everyday life memories. Overall, this study demonstrates that “social memory functions as a key mediating mechanism” linking geographical environment, social practice, and vernacular architectural space, which provides new theoretical and methodological support for understanding the evolutionary logic of basin settlements and for guiding cultural heritage renewal.更多还原