【摘要】 随着城乡要素双向流动日益频繁，传统将城市化界定为乡村向城市单向演进过程的理论，已难以有效解释当前县域内部日益复杂的城乡互动关系。本文构建“城市性vs.乡村性×发展性”双棱锥体分析框架，将行政村与社区纳入统一评价体系，系统刻画城乡融合进程中村社之间的多维互动特征。本文以山东省枣庄市山亭区的村社为基本评价单元，基于多源数据采用综合评价与社会网络分析等方法，构建个体与网络指数评估方法体系，并开展“分级—分类—分区”多层次空间结构分析。研究发现：(1)山亭区在村社个体尺度上，城市性呈多点极化分布，乡村性在平原区呈高值连片分布，发展性受多重因素影响，整体均衡而局部分散。(2)考虑村社之间的网络联系后，三维综合指数空间格局特征更为显著，城市性表现为多极联动，乡村性呈自西向东延展，发展性呈多元扩散。(3)在分级上，“发中城中”型村社占比最高；在分类上，融合发展类为主导；在分区上，城乡融合先行区占比最大，初步构建起以要素联动、功能集聚为核心的城乡融合空间体系。本文提出因地制宜策略，为县域城乡关系重构与空间治理优化提供理论支撑与路径参考，尤其在村社一体化评估及城乡互动关系识别方面具有创新意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 The growing recognition of bidirectional urban-rural resource flows reveals the inadequacy of the traditional urbanization model, which conceptualizes development as a oneway rural-to-urban transition, in explaining the complex evolution of county-level rural-urban relations. This study proposes an "Urbanity vs. Rurality × Development" double pyramid framework that unifies villages and communities within a single assessment system, enabling a comprehensive analysis of rural-urban relations. Using villages and communities in Shanting district, Zaozhuang city as the basic evaluation units, this study draws on multi-source data, to develop a methodology for assessing individual and network indices through comprehensive evaluation and social network analysis; and then it conducts a three-level spatial structure analysis of the study area via a "grading-categorization-zoning" approach. The results are shown as follows.(1) Within the individual index of Shanting district, urbanity exhibits a multipolar and scattered distribution, whereas rurality forms contiguous high-value clusters across the plains. Development is shaped by multiple interacting factors, resulting in an overall spatial equilibrium accompanied by localized dispersion.(2) After accounting for village–community network connections, the three-dimensional indices reveal a more pronounced spatial pattern: urbanity forms multi-polar linkages, rurality diffuses west to east, and development exhibits multi-directional diffusion.(3) In terms of grading, "middle development-high urbanity" areas account for the largest share; in terms of categorization, integrated development areas are the dominant type; and in terms of zoning, the pilot zones for urban-rural integration hold the highest proportion. A spatial system centered on factor linkage and functional agglomeration is thus initially established. The study concludes by proposing context-specific strategies, providing theoretical and practical insights into urban-rural restructuring, especially in evaluating unified villages and communities and analyzing their multidimensional interactions.更多还原