【摘要】 长久以来，囿于自然—社会的二元对立思想，水一直被认为是具有单一自然属性的一种资源，而忽略了水与社会之间多元动态复杂的互构关系，特别是对水嵌套的权力政治关系尚未明晰。论文借鉴政治生态学的思想，以有“三江汇流、湾区之源”之称的佛山江根村为案例地，采用质性研究方法，试图展演水—社会领域视角下乡村—水的关系变化过程与机制。研究发现：(1)水不仅是村民生产生活所需，也是超越乡村社区尺度的政治水，还是协调保护与发展的生态水与旅游水；(2)乡村—水关系的动态演变背后主要围绕信仰凝聚下村民主动领域化—政府主导下村民被动去领域化—政府和资本共同驱动下村民“被动的自主”再领域化这一逻辑来呈现；(3)乡村—水的关系的演变实际上是水所承载的政治、经济、社会关系的变化，是主体—空间—权力—资源相互作用的结果。研究剖析了嵌入城市的乡村水治理过程中不同主体的领域化策略，丰富了水—社会领域的研究情境；实践层面有利于促进提出更为公平合理的水治理、水补偿方案。更多还原

【Abstract】 For a long time, confined by the dualistic thinking of nature versus society, water has been regarded as a resource with solely natural attributes, neglecting the complex and dynamic interrelationship between water and society, especially that the power-political relationships embedded in water have not yet been clarified.Based on the political ecology approach, this research took Jianggen Village in Foshan City—known as the "confluence of three rivers and the source of the bay area" —as a case study area, and adopted qualitative research methods to demonstrate the process and mechanism of dynamic changes of rural area-water relationship from the perspective of hydrosocial territory. The findings are as follows: 1) Water is not only necessary for rural residents’ production and daily life but also political water that transcends the scale of village, as well as ecological and tourism water that coordinates protection and development. 2) The dynamic evolution of the rural area-water relationship primarily follows a logic of rural residents’ proactive domainization under the cohesion of beliefs, passive de-territorialization led by the government, and "passive autonomy" re-territorialization driven jointly by the government and capital. 3) The evolution of the rural area-water relationship is essentially a transformation of the political, economic, and social relations carried by the water, resulting from the interaction between subjects, spaces, power, and resources. The study analyzed the territorialization strategies of different subjects in the process of urban-embedded village water governance, which enriches the research context of hydrosocial territory. It is also conducive to promoting more equitable and reasonable water governance and water compensation schemes.更多还原