节点文献

国际低空空域规划政策与实践路径比较研究——基于美、欧、日的经验

A Comparative Study on International Low-altitude Airspace Planning Policies and Implementation Pathways:Experience from the United States, Europe, and Japan

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张博雅梁思思庄惟敏张维

【Author】 Boya Zhang;Sisi Liang;Weimin Zhuang;Wei Zhang;School of Architecture, Tsinghua University;Chinese Academy of Sciences;Tsinghua University School of Architecture;the Architectural Design and Research Institute of Tsinghua University Co., Ltd.;Architectural Design and Research Institute of Tsinghua University Co., Ltd.;

【通讯作者】 梁思思;

【机构】 清华大学建筑学院中国工程院清华大学建筑设计研究院清华大学建筑设计研究院有限公司

【摘要】 低空经济正推动城市空间向三维立体拓展,低空空域已转变为亟需地面系统深度支撑的立体运行空间。本文以低空空域规划为核心,在梳理国内现状基础上,对比研究了美国先进空中交通(AAM)的战略逻辑、欧洲U-space的服务化治理及日本的低空应用场景化实验等政策及实践。基于国际经验,文章探讨了面向地—空协同规划响应的低空空域规划路径:建议在空间层面从空中航线转向地—空垂直协同、设施层面统筹能源—交通—信息多网体系、运行层面以数字化设计支撑差异化发展,并将社会许可纳入规划评估框架,旨在为我国相关低空空域规划治理提供参考。

【Abstract】 The low-altitude economy is driving the expansion of urban space into the third dimension, transforming low-altitude airspace into a volumetric operational space that necessitates deep support from ground-based systems. Focusing on low-altitude airspace planning and reviewing the current status in China, this paper conducts a comparative study of strategic logic of advanced air mobility(AAM) in the United States, the service-oriented governance of U-space in Europe, and the scenario-based experimentation in Japan. Drawing on these international experiences, the study explores planning response pathways oriented toward “ground-air integration”. It proposes transcending the limitations of isolated airspace designation by integrating “energy-transport-information” into volumetric operational units and incorporating the “social license” into the planning assessment framework. The findings aim to provide theoretical references and practical guidance for relevant planning endeavors.

【基金】 北京市社会科学基金重点项目(25BJ02014)
  • 【分类号】TU984.113;V35
  • 【下载频次】41
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络