【摘要】 目的 探讨合肥市某高校高龄老人生活质量状况及相关影响因素。方法 采用方便抽样的方法,以合肥市某高校80岁及以上的215名高龄老人为研究对象。采取入户面对面访谈的方式进行问卷调查,内容包括一般人口学和日常生活能力量表(ADL)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)及世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)。采用多元线性回归分析高龄老人人口学特征、生活自理能力、共病、自评身体状况、自评经济水平及社会支持对生活质量的影响。结果 共调查215名高龄老人,他们的生理、心理、社会关系及环境维度得分分别为(50.2±15.3)(53.9±15.4)(56.8±11.5)(55.6±13.9)分。自评身体状况越好(β=3.609)、没有共病(β=9.095)、自评经济水平越高(β=3.209)的高龄老人,生理维度得分越高(P值均<0.05);年龄越小(β=-4.790)、自评身体状况越好(β=3.522)、自评经济水平越高(β=5.497)的高龄老人,心理维度得分越高(P值均<0.05);目前有配偶(β=-3.303)、自评经济水平越高(β=3.835)的高龄老人,社会关系维度得分越高;无共病(β=5.894)、自评经济水平越高(β=4.975)的高龄老人,环境维度得分越高。社会支持得分高的高龄老人在生理维度(β=8.470)、心理维度(β=10.670)、社会关系维度(β=3.770)和环境维度(β=8.463)得分均较高(P值均<0.05)。结论 合肥市某高校高龄老人总体生活质量水平不高,卫生保健医生及社会工作者应关注高龄老人的生活质量。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the quality of life and related influencing factors of the elderly in a university in Hefei.Methods The research utilized a convenience sampling approach, and 215 elderly participants aged 80 years and above from a university in Hefei were selected as the study subjects. Data collection was conducted through face-to-face interviews,the questionnaire encompassed general demographic information, the Activities of Daily Living( ADL) scale, the Social Support Rating Scale( SSRS), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version( WHOQOL-BREF). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the impacts of demographic characteristics, self-care ability, comorbidities,self-rated health status, self-rated economic level, and social support on the quality of life in the elderly.Results A total of 215 elderly individuals were surveyed, and their scores in the physical, psychological, social relationships, and environmental domains were(50. 2±15. 3)(53. 9±15. 4)(56. 8±11. 5), and(55. 6±13. 9), respectively. The elderly individuals with better self-rated physical health(β= 3. 609), no comorbidity(β= 9. 095), and better self-rated economic level(β= 3. 209) had higher scores in the physiological dimension( all P<0. 05). Those who were younger(β=-4. 790), had better self-rated physical health(β= 3. 522), and better self-rated economic level(β= 5. 497) scored higher in the psychological dimension(P<0. 05). Those who currently had a spouse(β=-3. 303) and better self-rated economic level(β= 3. 835) scored higher in the social relationship dimension. Those without comorbidity(β= 5. 894) and with better self-rated economic level(β= 4. 975) scored higher in the environmental dimension. The elderly individuals with higher social support scores also had higher scores in the physiological dimension(β= 8. 470), psychological dimension(β= 10. 670), social relationship dimension(β= 3. 770), and environmental dimension(β= 8. 463)( all P< 0. 05).Conclusion The overall quality of life of the elderly in the university in Hefei is not high, the healthcare doctors and social workers should pay attention to the quality of life of the elderly.更多还原