【摘要】 目的 系统评价儿童药物治疗满意度（TS-M）测评研究。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、CBM、WanFang Data、VIP和CNKI数据库及医学量表网站，搜集有关儿童TS-M测评的研究，检索时限均为建库至2022年11月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料。采用描述性分析全面梳理研究所选用的TS-M测评工具，采用健康测量工具遴选标准（COSMIN）评估现有儿童TS-M量表的开发质量和测量性能。结果 共纳入157个研究，包括TS-M测评工具的儿童应用研究150项和儿童TS-M量表的开发及验证研究7项，涉及儿童TS-M特异性量表7种。使用自制TS-M问卷或访谈测评儿童TS-M的儿童应用研究占67.3%，使用成人TS-M量表的占24.7%，使用2种儿童TS-M特异性量表仅占6.0%。量表的开发质量及测量性能评价结果显示，现有儿童TS-M量表的开发质量为“有问题”或“不合格”，具有“足够”的内部一致性但“不确定”的结构效度；尚缺乏量表的内容效度、重测信度和建构效度研究。结论 当前儿童研究选用的TS-M测评工具存在不合理：超90%儿童研究使用自制问卷或成人量表测评儿童TS-M；现有儿童TS-M量表应用范围较窄、开发质量存在问题、缺乏测量性能研究；尚缺乏应用范围广的儿童TS-M量表。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To systematically review the research on pediatric treatment satisfaction of medication(TS-M). Methods The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP, CNKI databases and medical scale websites were electronically searched to collect studies on pediatric TS-M from inception to November 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, and extracted data. Using descriptive analysis, we comprehensively reviewed the TS-M assessment tool selected for the studies of children. We evaluated the methodological quality and measurement properties of existing TS-M scales for children using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments(COSMIN) assessment criteria. Results A total of 157 studies were included, including 150pediatric studies using TS-M evaluation tools and 7 studies on the development and validation of TS-M scales for children,covering 7 specific TS-M scales for children. Our review revealed that 67.3% of the pediatric studies used unvalidated selfadministered TS-M questionnaires or interviews, 24.7% used adult TS-M scales, and only 6.0% used two pediatric-specific TS-M scales. The results of the quality assessment indicated that the development quality of existing TS-M pediatric scales was considered "doubtful" or "inadequate", and the internal consistency was "sufficient" but the structural validity was probably "uncertain". High-quality research on the content validity, test-retest reliability and construct validity of the pediatric TS-M scale was still lacking. Conclusion Currently, the use of TS-M evaluation tools in pediatric studies has irrationalities: over 90% of pediatric studies use self-made questionnaires or adult scales to evaluate children’s TS-M; and the existing pediatric TS-M scales globally have narrow applications, questionable development quality, and lack some measurement performance studies. Pediatric TS-M scales with a wide range of applications are lacking.更多还原