节点文献

藏药鼠麴草的质量评价研究

Quality Evaluation for the Tibetan Materia Medica of Gnaphalium affine

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨锡金刘翔王云红张小梅舒抒阳勇王计瑞钟国跃

【Author】 Yang Xijin;Liu Xiang;Wang Yunhong;Zhang Xiaomei;Shu Shu;Yang Yong;Wang Jirui;Zhong Guoyue;Three Grade Lab.of Chinese Medicine Chemistry, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine/Chongqing Key Lab.of Chinese Medicine Resources, Chongqing Academy of Chinese Materia Medica;Chongqing Sub-center of National Resources Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science;College of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University;

【通讯作者】 阳勇;王计瑞;

【机构】 重庆市中药研究院国家中医药管理局中药化学三级实验室/重庆市中药资源学重点实验室中国中医科学院中药资源中心重庆分中心遵义医科大学药学院

【摘要】 目的:评价鼠麴草(Gnaphalium affine D. Don)的质量。方法:采用TLC法进行定性鉴别,按2020年版《中华人民共和国药典》四部通则方法测定水分、总灰分、酸不溶性灰分和浸出物含有量,通过HPLC法测定木犀草素和芹菜素的含有量。采用SPSS 20.0软件对23批鼠麴草进行聚类分析和主成分分析。结果:TLC斑点清晰,分离度好。23批样品水分、总灰分、酸不溶性灰分和浸出物含有量分别为7.83%~10.70%、5.95%~17.11%、0.83%~9.40%和8.87%~27.43%。木犀草素和芹菜素分别在0.7~374.5μg/mL(r=0.999 9)和0.4~195.5μg/mL(r=0.999 4)范围内线性关系良好,平均加样回收率分别为98.95%(RSD=1.94%)和97.18%(RSD=3.46%)。西藏地区的样品被聚为一类,其他地区样品分布离散,分类结果与地域有关。结论:该方法稳定可靠,可用于鼠麴草的质量评价。

【Abstract】 Objective:To evaluate the quality of Gnaphalium affine D. Don. Methods:The qualitative identification was performed by TLC. The contents of water, total ash, acid-insoluble ash and extract were determined according to the methods of the four general rules of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia(2020 edition). The contents of luteolin and apigenin were determined by HPLC. Cluster analysis and principal component analysis were performed on 23 batches of G. affine by SPSS 20.0. Results:The TLC spots were clear with good resolution. The content of water, total ash, acid-insoluble ash and extract were 7.83% ~ 10.70%, 5.95% ~ 17.11%, 0.83% ~ 9.40% and 8.87% ~ 27.43% in 23 batches of samples, respectively. Luteolin and apigenin showed good linear relationships within the ranges of 0.7 ~374.5 μg/mL(r = 0.999 9) and 0.4 ~ 195.5 μg/mL(r = 0.999 4), whose average recoveries were 98.95%(RSD = 1.94%) and 97.18%(RSD = 3.46%), respectively. The samples from Tibet were clustered into one category, while the others were distributed discretely. The classification results were related to regions. Conclusion:This stable and reliable method could be used for the quality evaluation of G. affine.

【基金】 国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1712300);中国药品监管科学行动计划项目(NMPAJGKX-2023-080)
  • 【文献出处】 中国野生植物资源 ,Chinese Wild Plant Resources , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年01期
  • 【分类号】R284.1
  • 【下载频次】44
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络