节点文献

慢性肾脏病和心力衰竭患者优化肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统拮抗剂应用和高钾血症管理的中国多学科专家德尔菲共识(英文)

A Chinese Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus to Optimize RAASi Usage and Hyperkalaemia Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 赵明辉陈崴程虹刘必成毛志国田庄徐刚周京敏

【Author】 Ming-Hui Zhao;Wei Chen;Hong Cheng;Bi-Cheng Liu;Zhi-Guo Mao;Zhuang Tian;Gang Xu;Jing-Min Zhou;Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital;Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University;Department of Nephrology, Capital Medical University;Department of Nephrology, Southeast University Zhongda Hospital;Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital;Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital;Renal Division, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology;Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University;

【通讯作者】 赵明辉;

【机构】 北京大学第一医院肾内科中山大学第一附属医院肾内科首都医科大学安贞医院肾内科东南大学中大医院肾内科海军军医大学长征医院肾内科中国医学科学院北京协和医院心内科华中科技大学同济医院肾内科复旦大学中山医院心内科

【摘要】 目的 临床上针对慢性肾脏病(chronic kidney disease,CKD)和心力衰竭(heart failure,HF)患者在肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统拮抗剂(renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors,RAASi)应用和处理高钾血症的管理存在差异。本研究旨在建立CKD和HF患者中优化RAASi应用和高钾血症管理的多学科中国专家共识。方法 邀请来自中国不同地区有经验的的肾内科和心内科专家,应用名义小组技术(nominal group technique,NGT)讨论CKD和HF患者的高钾血症管理的挑战和建议。专家组提出了41条陈述/建议作为共识问卷,该问卷随后发给扩大的中国各地肾内科和心内科专家,通过改良的德尔菲技术评估每一项陈述/建议,给出强推荐(同意票≥75%且<90%)和非常强推荐(同意票≥90%)。建立专家组、数据收集和分析由独立的专业人员协助完成。结果 共有来自中国21个省的150名肾内科和心内科医生完成问卷,每个专业各75名。所有41条陈述/建议均达到了超过75%的共识同意的阈值,其中27条为非常强共识(≥90%同意),14条为强共识(75%~90%同意)。结论 基于问卷调查的结果,中国专家组提出了一系列推荐意见用于慢性肾脏病和心力衰竭患者优化RAASi应用和高钾血症管理。

【Abstract】 Objective Variations are present in common clinical practices regarding best practice in managing hyperkalaemia(HK), there is therefore a need to establish a multi-specialty approach to optimal reninangiotension-aldosterone system inhibitors(RAASi) usage and HK management in patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD) & heart failure(HF).This study aimed to establish a multi-speciality approach to the optimal use of RAASi and the management of HK in patients with CKD and HF.Methods A steering expert group of cardiology and nephrology experts across China were convened to discuss challenges to HK management through a nominal group technique. The group then created a list of 41 statements for a consensus questionnaire, which was distributed for a further survey in extended panel group of cardiologists and nephrologists across China. Consensus was assessed using a modified Delphi technique, with agreement defined as "strong"(≥75% and <90%) and "very strong"(≥90%). The steering group, data collection, and analysis were aided by an independent facilitator.Results A total of 150 responses from 21 provinces across China were recruited in the survey. Respondents were comprised of an even split(n=75, 50%) between cardiologists and nephrologists. All 41 statements achieved the 75% consensus agreement threshold, of which 27 statements attained very strong consensus(≥90% agreement) and 14 attained strong consensus(agreement between 75% and 90%).Conclusion Based on the agreement levels from respondents, the steering group agreed a set of recommendations intended to improve patient outcomes in the use of RAASi therapy and HK management in China.

  • 【文献出处】 Chinese Medical Sciences Journal ,中国医学科学杂志(英文版) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年02期
  • 【分类号】R541.6;R692
  • 【下载频次】8
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络