【摘要】 在电子商务蓬勃发展的数字时代，避风港规则预设的适用场景已不复存在。以先进网络科技为支撑的电商平台远非昔日技术中立的传输通道和存储空间。得益于智能科技，平台过滤和预防知识产权侵权的能力极大提升。平台内经营者均属具备相应资质、资本的注册用户，平台制止侵权的紧迫性远不如侵犯网络著作权的案件。因此，对于平台内经营者知识产权侵权，平台应否承担帮助侵权责任，其裁判理当回归传统的过错责任原则，“红旗标准”和“通知—删除”规则可在过错认定中发挥重要的辅助作用。只要直接侵权者能够被查证并具备赔偿能力，法院就应判令其承担全部赔偿责任。作为敦促平台经营者加强平台治理的连带责任，只能在极其例外的情形下适用。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the current legal background and technical conditions, the preset scenarios of the safe harbor rule no longer exist. E-commerce platforms supported by advanced network technologies are far from the technology-neutral transmission channels and storage spaces. Thanks to the rapid development of intelligent technology, platform’s filtering and prevention capabilities have been greatly improved. Operators on these platforms are registered users with appropriate qualifications and capital, making the urgency to prevent IP infringement far less than in the cases involving copyright infringement on network. Therefore, for IP infringement by platform operators,whether the platform should bear contributory liability must be evaluated under the traditional fault liability principle, while the "red flag criteria" and the "notice-and-takedown" mechanism can play an important secondary role in determining fault. As long as the direct infringers can be verified and has the ability to compensate, courts should hold them to bear the full liability for damages. Joint liability as a way of urging platform operators to strengthen the governance of platform concerning IP can only be applied in extremely exceptional circumstances.更多还原