节点文献
长江、黄河两大流域可持续发展研究比较
Comparison of sustainable development research on the Yangtze River and Yellow River Basin
【摘要】 长江经济带发展战略、黄河流域生态保护与高质量发展战略均为中国重要的流域型战略。然而,两大流域型战略确立的时间不同,自然环境、生态状况、经济发展水平等方面不同,可持续发展研究的侧重点也不同。本文借助CiteSpace工具,围绕联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs),对长江、黄河两大流域型战略自确立以来至2023年9月的可持续发展研究文献进行知识图谱分析,厘清研究的特点和差异,提出未来的研究方向。结果表明:(1)位于流域沿线的高校和科研机构是可持续发展研究的主要力量,研究机构间均初步形成合作网络,但联系与合作程度较低。长江中下游的研究机构是长江经济带可持续发展研究的主要力量,而黄河中上游的研究机构是黄河流域可持续发展研究的主要力量。(2)绿色发展、高质量发展、耦合协调、环境规制是两大流域可持续发展研究的共同热点。长江经济带侧重如何提升资源利用效率,推动经济高质量发展和绿色化发展,黄河流域侧重原生生态保护,综合考虑资源环境承载力和生态系统服务价值。(3)在SDGs框架下,两大流域可持续发展研究有着共同的议题,但其侧重点有所不同。SDG9、SDG12、SDG15是两大流域共同关注的重点;从环境、经济、社会3个领域核心目标来看,经济领域的SDG8和SDG9、环境领域的SDG12和SDG15,以及社会领域的SDG2和SDG16受到更多关注。此外,SDG8下的数字经济和SDG13下的双碳目标是近年来的新兴热点,SDG6对应的水资源问题是两大流域共同关注的重要议题。据此,从提高研究区域和尺度的多元化等方面提出未来的研究方向。
【Abstract】 Both the development strategy of the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the ecological protection and high-quality development strategy of the Yellow River Basin are important basin strategies in China. However, the two watershed strategies were established in different times, under different natural environment, ecological status, economic development level, and other conditions, and the focus of sustainable development research is also different. Using the CiteSpace tool, this study analyzed the literature on the sustainable development research in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin based on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) from strategy establishment to September 2023, clarified the characteristics and differences of the research, and put forward future research directions. The results show that:(1) The universities and research institutions located along the river basins were the main forces of sustainable development research, and the cooperation network between research institutions has initially formed, but the degree of contact and cooperation was low. The research institutions in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River were the main forces in the research on the sustainable development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, while the research institutions in the middle and upper reaches of the Yellow River were the main forces in the research on the sustainable development of the Yellow River Basin.(2) Green development, high-quality development, coupling and coordination, and environmental regulation were the common hotspots in the research on sustainable development of the two major watersheds. The Yangtze River Economic Belt focused on improving the efficiency of resource utilization and promoting high-quality and green economic development, while the Yellow River Basin focused on the protection of the native ecology, taking into account the carrying capacity of resources and environment and the value of ecosystem services.(3) Under the framework of SDGs, research on the sustainable development of the two major river basins shared common topics, but their emphases were different. SDG9, SDG12, and SDG15 were the common focus of the two watershed research. From the perspective of the core objectives of each field, SDG8 and SDG9 in the economic field,SDG12 and SDG15 in the environmental field, and SDG2 and SDG16 in the social field received more attention. In addition, the digital economy under SDG8 and the dual carbon goals under SDG13 were emerging hotspots in recent years, and the water resources problem corresponding to SDG6 was an important issue facing the two major river basins. Therefore, future research direction was proposed from the aspects of improving the diversification of research areas and scales, among others.
【Key words】 Yangtze River Economic Belt; Yellow River Basin; sustainable development; bibliometric analysis; CiteSpace;
- 【文献出处】 资源科学 ,Resources Science , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年11期
- 【分类号】X22;F124.5
- 【下载频次】163