【摘要】 [目的/意义]深入了解新时代高校决策咨询类成果评价制度改革进展、存在的问题，为持续深化改革提供素材。[方法/过程]采用网络调查法、政策文本分析法、理论分析法，对30所本科高校相应政策文本进行系统整理分析，掌握改革实践进展状况。[结果/结论]调查发现，存在6个突出问题，即评价客体不统一、评价主体构成单一、评价方法单一、评价标准体系不健全、署名要求过于僵化以及结果应用范围偏窄。针对调研高校制度存在的问题，本文对应提出了6个方面的改进对策，即适度扩大决策咨询类科研成果认定范围、健全成果评价用户为主组织制度、根据评价目的完善评价方法、完善以质量创新和实际贡献为导向的评价标准体系、对高级别特殊决策咨询类科研成果取消“第一”署名限制以及适度扩展认定成果的应用范围。更多还原

【Abstract】 [Purpose/significance] The aim of this paper is to gain a deeper understanding of the progress and existing problems in the reform of the evaluation system for decision-making consulting achievements in universities, and to provide materials for the continuous deepening of the reform. [Method/process] Using the network survey method, policy text analysis method, and theoretical analysis method, a systematic analysis is conducted on the corresponding policy texts of 30 undergraduate universities. The progress of reform practices is mastered.[Result/conclusion] The investigation found that there are six prominent issues as follows: Inconsistent evaluation objects, single evaluation subject composition, single evaluation methods, incomplete evaluation standard system,overly rigid signature requirements, and narrow application scope of results. Corresponding improvement measures have been proposed to address the existing problems. In response to the problems existing in the research university system, six corresponding improvement measures have been proposed: Moderately expanding the scope of decision-making and consulting scientific research achievements recognition, improving the user-centered organizational system for evaluating achievements, improving evaluation methods based on evaluation purposes,improving the evaluation standard system guided by quality innovation and actual contribution, and abolishing the “first” signature restriction on high-level special decision-making and consulting scientific research achievements moderately expanding the application scope of recognized achievements.更多还原